In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Metzeler Kautschuk AG gegen Schoeps-Stiftung 1. Instanz
u. a. Klageschrift und weitere Schriftsätze RA Dr. Bock als Prozessvertreter der Metzeler Kautschuk AG; Schriftsätze und Aktenvermerke BM Dr. Martini und Herr Elker für die Stiftung; Schriftwechsel mit dem Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe als Aufsichtbehörde der Stiftung; Duplikate aus der Errichtungsphase der Stiftung, insbesondere Testamentsvollstreckergebühren und Geschäftsführergehalt der Schoeps-GmbH betreffend; Urteil OLG München vom 22.09.1976 (Stiftung gegen Metzeler AG); Schriftsätze RA Dr. Brändel als Rechtsberater der Stiftung; Klageerwiderung und weitere Schriftsätze Dr. Syren als Prozessvertreter der Stiftung; Kostenrechnungen der Anwälte; Duplikate Revisionsbegründung Stiftung gegen Metzeler AG; Kommentare zur Verjährung; Urteil LG Mannheim vom 26.07.1977: Klage der Metzeler Kautschuk AG gegen Stiftung abgewiesen
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Rechteinformation beim Datenlieferanten zu klären.
