In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Kapitän Gustav von Bergholtz contra Sophia Elisabeth Trittelvitz. - Kammerherr Baron von Zülich zu Willerswalde contra den daselbst gewesenen Müller Christian Hancken. - der Altermann Dabis und der Notar Lembcken, als jetzige Praesentanten des von dem Doktor und Professor Lembcken verordneten Stipendii, contra die königliche Akademie zu Greifswald. - Kaufleute Hinrich Vick und Nicolaus Ferdinand Franck contra einige Membra I. et V. Classis des Collegii Centumviralis in Stralsund. - Advocatus Emanuel Hinrich Hagemeister in Stralsund contra die Quartierkammer daselbst, in Specie den Ratsverwandten von Essen. - Amtmann Heidemann zu Rantzien contra den Pastor Wachholtz daselbst der königliche Jagd-Fiscal contra die Witwe von Heyden. - die verwitwete Amtshauptmannin von Averdieck contra des Regierungsrats Grafen von Bohlen nachgelassene Kinder und derer minorennen Vormünder. - Amt der Weiß- und Fastbecker in Wismar contra die Looßbecker daselbst. - Holländer Hans Krauel contra den Strandreiter Suhr. - sämtliche Untertanen und Einlieger zu Pruchten und Bodstedt contra den Pfandträger zu Niehoff, H. C. Stuthen. - der Altermann des Gewandhauses in Stralsund Jürgen Berend Brandenburg contra den Kammerherrn von Wulfrath auf Plüggentin. - Referendarius Edlen von Essen contra Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Greifswald. - Goldschmied Johann Friedrich Greisen zu Wolgast contra seine Ehefrau, geborene Hermannen. - Akademie zu Greifswald contra die Pommersche Landesregierung. - der Schmied Buchtin in Barth, uxorio nomine, contra den Diaconum Gräff daselbst, als Erben der Magdalena Sybilla von Dechow. - Professor und Syndicus Academiae von Essen contra Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Greifswald. - Akademie zu Greifswald contra Bürgermeister und Rat daselbst, ad acta Professor und Syndicus Academiae von Essen contra Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Greifswald. - Bürger Ludwig Volckwardt aus Barth contra den Pfandträger Westphalen zu Prutmanshagen. - Kaufmann Hinrich Vick contra Johann Christian Mönnich. - Procurator Domaniorum, namens der königlichen Pommerschen Kammer, contra des königlichen hohen Tribunals und Hofgerichts-Advocatum Hinrich Christopher Bohm. - Hans Berend Nevermann, namens seiner Frau Eve Agneta Cäthe Kahlen, contra den Schiffszimmergesellen Ulrich Oldenburg. - Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Greifswald contra den Commissarium Emanuel Salomon von Lillienancker zu Dargelin. - der Handelsjude Berend Michel Hertz contra den Postdirektor Lindemann. - sämtliche Poelsche Hausleute contra den Amtmann Hennings auf Poel. - Hieronymus Christian Ungnade contra den Ratskellermeister Johann Michael Stein
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International