In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Kleve-Märkische Regierung, Landessachen >> 11. Ämter, Gerichte und Herrschaften >> 11.22. Amt Plettenberg (Schwarzenberg) >> 11.22.2. Verwaltung und Rechtssprechung
1660-1693
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u. a.: - Johann Berndt Plettenberg, natürlicher Sohn des Heinrich von Plettenberg ./. sein Onkel Christof von Plettenberg: Auszahlung eines Legats, 1677 - Erstattung der bei Eintreibung von Kornlieferungen für das Magazin zu Lippstadt durch Einquartierungen zu Plettenberg (besonders für Hermann Molthaus) entstandenen Unkosten durch Oberempfänger Hermann Altfeldt, 1678, 1684 - Ungesetzliche Abgabenerhebung durch Vorsteher Anton (Tönnies) von der Wieden, 1683-1684 - Übernahme der Amtsrezeptur durch Lic. Arnold Johann Esselen, 1683-1685 - Nachzahlung der Gehaltszulage für Johann Adolf Savenstett zu Mülheim/Ruhr, ehemals Prediger zu Plettenberg, 1685 - Verrechnung von Kölnischen Courant-Talern des Weseler Kaufmanns Heinrich von Lendt, 1686 - Amtmann Jobst Henrich von Plettenberg ./. Richter Freidag Dietrich Esselen: Pflugdienstpflicht des Schulte zu Marl, 1692-1694 - Abbruch eines zur Vikarie St. Stephani gehörenden Hauses durch Heinrich Bernhard Dybbe bzw. seinen Schwager Johann Bernhard Plettenberg, 1693 Enthält auch: - von der Horst ./. Abt zu Werden: Lehnsbeziehungen, 1660 (Gutachten des Dr. iur. Johann Witte)
Sachakte
Plettenberg
Plettenberg
Magazin
Plettenberg
Molthaus, Hermann
Alfeldt, Hermann
Wieden
Vorsteher
Eselen
Amtsrezeptur
Savenstett
Mülheim
Plettenberg
Lendt
Weseler
Plettenberg
Plettenberg
Plettenberg
Esselen
Marl
Dybbe
Plettenberg
Horst
Werden
Werden
Witte, Johann
Vikarie St. Stephani
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.