In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Fürstentum Siegen, Landesarchiv - Akten 36 V Nr. 5 c
E 601 Freier Grund Sel- und Burbach
Freier Grund Sel- und Burbach >> 2. Sayn-Hachenburgische Regierung >> 2.8. Mühlensachen
1662-1698
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Berichte des Schulheißen Conrad Iscken zu Neunkirchen an die Gräfin Louisa Juliana zu Sayn über Anschaffung eines Mühlensteins für die Heller Mühle (1662); Bericht über den Bau eines Wasserrades (1667); Verzeichnis des Müllers Ordörff zu Heller Mühle über seine jährlichen Lieferungen (ca. 1667); Anschaffung eines neuen Mühlensteins (1670); Berichte des Oberschulheißen Bauermeister zu Neunkirchen über Reparaturen an der Heller Mühle (1690); Überlassung von Bauholz zur Reparatur der Heller Mühle (1691); Besichtigungen der Heller Mühle (1695, 1698); Gesuche des Müllers Arnold Becker zu Heller Mühle um Erlass eines verhängten Strafgeldes (1698); Supplik der Witwe Johannetta von Selbach, geborene von und zu der Hees, wegen ihres halben Anteils an der Heller Mühle und wegen unerlaubter Änderungen durch den derzeitigen Müller sowie Besichtigung des Heller Mühle (1698); Reskript der Gräfin Franzisca Eleonora Clara von Pötting und Manderscheid wegen der Reparatur ihrer zur Halbscheid zugehörigen Heller Mühle (26.08.1698). Korrespondenten u.a.: Schultheiß Conrad Iscken (Neunkirchen), Ludwig Ernst von Selbach genannt Lange, Müller Johann Ordörff (Heller Mühle), Oberschultheiß Bauermeister (Neunkirchen), Grün (Hachenburg), Amtsverwalter Wilhelm Helling (Hachenburg), Johannetta von Selbach geborene von und zu der Hees, Franzisca Eleonora Clara Gräfin von Pötting und Manderscheid.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.