In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
8/11 [Nr. 3,17]: Bitte der Heerbrandischen Erben um Rückerstattung des Geldes mit der Begründung, dass eine Bezahlung auch früher nicht üblich war
UAT 8/ Ältere Universitätsregistratur, Vermischte Sachakten (II)
Ältere Universitätsregistratur, Vermischte Sachakten (II) >> 6. Cancellarii judicium appellatorium (1586-1773) >> Cancellarii judicium appellatorium, Appellationes, Fasz. I: Nr. 1-4
1600
Enthält: Bl. 45-50v: Die Erben Dr. Jak. Heerbrands an den Herzog, 28.7.1600: Bericht des Hergangs mit Abschriften der Belege. Die wenigen Appellationsverhandlungen fallen in die Jahre 1595-1598. Der Status Cancellariatus sagt nirgends, die Assessoren des Appellationsgerichts seien aus dem Beutel des Kanzlers zu bezahlen; kein Kanzler bezahlte sie. Im Juni 1598 wurde es von Heerbrand verlangt; er antwortete am 9.11.1598 (Nr. 9 Neusch.). Der Senat schwieg bis 23.6.1600; dann verlangte er 104 fl. Wir entgegeneten am 24.6.1600 (Nr. 13 Neusch.) und blieben ohne Antwort. Doch mag. Georg Burckhardt musste das Geld bis jetzt in Arrest behalten. Die Universität könnte die Assessoren aus dem freien Kanzlergehalt des Jahres 1599 bezahlen. Die Assessoren, die zugleich im Senat sitzen, entschieden in eigeneer Sache. Wir wollen auch dem Kanzleramt kein Präjudicium schaffen und bitten um Rückerstattung der 104 fl. A.
Akte
UAT 8/11 Nr. 3,1-3,25: Streit der Universität mit den Erben des Kanzlers Jakob Heerbrand um die Besoldung der Assessores des Appellationsgerichts. Nutzungsbedingungen für die Digitalisate: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
Cancellarii judicium appellatorium, Appellationes, Fasz. I: Nr. 1-4
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.