Melchior Otto [Voit von Salzburg], Bischof von Bamberg, und das Domkapitel Bamberg geben ihre Zustimmung zur etwaigen Lehnsnachfolge der bambergis...

Show full title
Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg
Data provider's object view
Urk. 14, 322
A I u, Bamberg sub dato
Vgl. altes Findbuch (R Nr. 1354), s.v. Stift Bambergische Lehen, Nr. 25
Urk. 14 Aktiv- und Passivlehen [ehemals: Urkunden A I u]
Aktiv- und Passivlehen [ehemals: Urkunden A I u] >> Passivlehen >> Bamberg, Bistum
1649 April 13
Lehnskonsens
Urkunde
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Melchior Otto [Voit von Salzburg], Bischof von Bamberg, und das Domkapitel Bamberg geben ihre Zustimmung zur etwaigen Lehnsnachfolge der bambergischen Lehen, die laut des zwischen den Vormündern der Brüder Friedrich Kasimir, Johann Philipp und Johann Reinhard [II.] Grafen von Hanau und Amalie Elisabeth Landgräfin von Hessen, geborener Gräfin von Hanau-Münzenberg, in Vormundschaft ihres Sohnes Wilhelm [VI.] Landgrafen von Hessen[-Kassel] 1643 geschlossenen Erbvertrags von den jeweiligen Lehnsherrn einzuholen ist. Es handelt sich dabei um die bambergischen Lehen Burg und Stadt Windecken [Stadtteil von Nidderau, Main-Kinzig-Kr.], den Dinghof zu Windecken und den Kirchsatz zu Windecken mit Zubehör. Nach dem Aussterben der Grafen von Hanau sollen die Lehen an die Landgrafen von Hessen-Kassel fallen.

Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Melchior Otto [Voit von Salzburg], Bischof von Bamberg, Domkapitel Bamberg

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
10.06.2025, 9:13 AM CEST
Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg
Data provider's object view

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg