In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Korrespondenz des Anton Schermar zu Ulm mit verschiedenen Partnern bzgl. seiner Münzsammlung
Patrizierarchiv Schermar Akten >> 2. Korrespondenz Anton Schermars
1666 - 1676
Enthält:
- Schreiben des Michel (?) Roth aus Nürnberg bzgl. Münzen, 1671
- Schreiben des Johann Jakob Müller aus Augsburg bzgl. Nachforschungen in den dortigen Bibliotheken zu numismatischer Literatur, 1676
- Schreiben des Hieronymus Schermar aus Memmingen bzgl. einer gefundenen Silbermünze, Rückseite Konzept Anton Schermars, 1676
- Schreiben von Schermars Schwager Erhard Schad, Obervogt zu Geislingen, bzgl. der Übersendung von 317 Münzen, 1666
- zwei Konzepte Schermars an den Notar Johann Scheel in Nürnberg, u. a. bzgl. eines Buches des Erasmus Francisci ("Kunst und Sittenspiegel ausländischer Völker", 1670) und darin enthaltenen Informationen, 1671-1672
- Konzept/Memorial Schermars an Matthäus Stürzel, Rat zu Ulm, wegen verschiedener Münzen und Münzabgüssen aus Straßburg, die dieser vom dortigen Messebesuch mitbringen soll, 1667
- Konzept Schermars an Dr. Zacharias Stenglen, Rat in Frankfurt, bzgl. Nachricht über dortige Numismatiker und Münzabgüsse, 1669
- Konzept Schermars an nicht genannten Adressaten bzgl. Münzabgüssen, 1667
9 Schr.
Archivale
Müller, Johann Jakob - (Augsburg)
Roth, Michel - (Nürnberg)
Schermar, Hieronymus - (Memmingen)
Francisci, Erasmus
Schermar, Anton - (Ulm)
Stürzel, Matthäus - (Ulm)
Scheel, Johannes - (Nürnberg)
Stenglen, Dr. Zacharias - (Ulm)
Schad, Erhard - (Dischingen)
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
