In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Herzog Wilhelm von Jülich und Berg bestätigt eine Rente der Städte Ratingen und Düsseldorf
Rathausarchiv >> Urkunden Mittelalter und Frühe Neuzeit
1510 Oktober 31
Regest: Herzog Wilhelm II. bekennt, daß die Städte Ratingen und Düsseldorf dem Dr. jur. Christian von Coinresheym, dessen Frau und ihren Erben für 1000 Goldgulden zwei Rentbriefe von je 25 Goldgulden verschrieben haben, einen für Vater und Sohn, den anderen für Mutter und Tochter. Die Hauptsumme hat der Herzog empfangen, der sich verpflichtet, die Rente aus den Gefällen von Angermund jährlich zu zahlen. Sollte die Bezahlun nicht erfolgen, kann Düsseldorf den Betrag und den Schaden von den jährlichen Mühlenpächten absetzen. In gleicher Gestalt hat Ratingen eine Urkunde erhalten. - Siegler: der Aussteller. - Dat. 1550 uff alre hilgen avent. Mit Unterschrift (van bevell etc.) Wilhelm Lünyncks mit Erwähnung Philipps Grafen von Waldeck und Bertrams von Lützenrode.
Ausfertigung. Pergament. Siegel ab.
36 x 27 cm
Urkunden
Literaturangabe: Lau, Friedrich: Geschichte der Stadt Düsseldorf, Band 1 Abt. 2: Urkunden und Akten; Düsseldorf 1921, S. 147, Nr. 298
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
