Urteilsbegründungen der Assessoren am Tribunal
Show full title
0383
LAG, Rep. 29 Wismarer Tribunal
Wismarer Tribunal >> 02. Relationen
01.07.1841-30.09.1841
Der Schumachermeister Friedrich Külz zu Loitz contra Dorothea Beutin. - Dr. Küther zu Neuendorf contra Pastor Knoblauch zu Neuenkirchen. - Der Pächter Dummert zu Pritzier contra den Pastor Odebrecht zu Sarnow. - Curatoren der von Usedom-Tetzitzer Verlassenschaft. - Der Sohn des Mühlenmeisters Johan Daniel Lass zu Tribohm contra den Gutsbesitzer Anders. - Der Ritter von Hennings contra den Pächter Rewold. - Der Müller Johan Christoph Schlüter zu Damgarten contra den Kaufmann Schwemer und Consorten. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Maurergesellen Johan Anton Andreas Brüning in Bergen. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Joachim Friedrich Witt in Barth. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Bedienten Johann Friedrich Meyer. - Pastor Henning in Stuthof bei Demmin contra Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Demmin. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Carl Gustav Rudolph von Röll. - Die von Behrscher Vormundschaft ad Decret. Reg. Docast. vom 11. und 16. Juli 1840. - Wilhelmine Kleemann zu Franzburg contra den Bäckermeister Löper zu Richtenberg. - Untersuchungssachen gegen das Dienstmädchen Johanna Marie Elisabeth Kraeft. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Eigentümer Jochen Friedrich Bruhn. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Knecht Carl Heinrich Hoffmann. - Der Sohn des Webers Frank zu Loitz contra den Einwohner Neumann. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Sattlergesellen Johann Peter Gottschalk zu Barth. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Christian Friedrich Harz
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
29.10.2025, 11:30 AM CET
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International