In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Testamente des Testamentendepositoriums Nr. 316-352
Kleve, Gerichte: Hauptbestand >> 2. II. Landgericht Kleve >> 2.5. Güterwesen und Familiensachen >> Testamente des Testamentendepositoriums
(29.05.1771-) 22.10.1795-15.09.1796
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält: Nr. 316. Eheleute Rudolph von Dennhoven zu Uffelt, 1795 Oktober 22; Nr. 317. Everdina Jansen, Witwe Jakob Heisterkamp zu Kleve, 1795 Oktober 28; Nr. 318. Eheleute Andreas Koenen und Theodora Verhees zu Materborn, 1795 November 2; Nr. 321. Gerhard Paulus, Bgr. zu Kleve, Erbin: seine Schwester Aletta, Ehefrau van Heys, 1795 November 19; Nr. 322. Eheleute Heinrich Johann und Anna Elisabeth Herterin zu Pfalzdorf, 1795 Dezember 14; Nr. 324. Witwe Rutt Gerritzen (+ ca. 1762), geb. Hendrina Blankers, auf dem Hiurthsteeg'schen Hof, Amt Kranenburg (71 J. alt), 1771 Mai 29; Nr. 325. Eheleute Conrad Scholten und Mechtild von Ackern zu Huisberden, 1775 August 30; Nr. 326. Franz van Haaren, Schöffe zu Niel und Ehefrau Wilhelmine Dramen, 1788 September 9; Nr. 327. Eheleute Domänenpächter Gerhard von de Sande und Derris Drissen zu Kellen, 1786 Mai 25; Nr. 328. Eheleute Anton Düffels und Johanna Berteray zu Warfreyen, 1796 März 15; Nr. 329. Eheleute Henr. Moerter zu Griethausen, Ehefrau Cath. Buschcappel, 1790 August 21; Nr. 330. Charlotte Louisa von Vinné (Sgl.) Kleve, Erbe: Hofrat Casp. Heh. Sethe. Legat: 2 luth. Prediger zu Kleve: Offelmeyer, Zimmermann, luth. Gem. edb., Arme edd.; Tochter Charl. bei ihrem Zimmermann, jetzt in Dresburg wohnt, ferner an den Färber Heiß, Eheleute Schuhmacher Jaenicke zu Kleve usw., 1796 März 26; Nr. 335. Heinrich Straatman zu Griethausen, 1796 Juni 2; Nr. 336. Eheleute Michel Michels und Catharina Thyssen zu Kleve, nahe beim Groenewald wohnhaft, 1796, Juni 3; Nr. 337. Gebrüder Johann und Heinrich Rimmen (Remmen) zu Kranenburg), 1796 Juni 16; Nr. 339. Eheleute Derk Meusen, Zimmermann, und Petronella Martens zu Goch, 1796 Juni 11; Nr. 340. Eheleute Heinrich Janssen und Johanna van Holt zu Uedemerfeld, 1796 Juni 16; Nr. 341. Eheleute Friedrich Giesbert Schmidt, Buchhalter der Kgl. Bank zu Kleve (Sgl.) (früheres Testament und Ehepakt, 1772 Oktober 1) und Anna Susanna Stenovius, 1796 Juli 13; Nr. 345. Eheleute Johannes Gödde und Margareta Arntz, zu Kleve, 1796 Juli 12; Nr. 347. Eheleute Johann Wilhelm Zirkler und Joh. Cath. Bruchen (3 Kinder!), Kleve, 1796 September 11; Nr. 349. Eheleute Wilhelm Reintjes und Hendrina Haas zu Griethausen, 1796 September 14; Nr. 351. Anna Catarina Schluiters, verwitwete Hagenbeck, Ehefrau Friseur Johann Sohry (Sovie), Zeugen: Chir. Auf Bloem, Zimmermeister Bernh. Pliester, zu Kleve, 1796 Juli 17; Nr. 352. Gerhard Lucassen zu Kellen, 1796 September 15.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.