In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Strittige Sachen, Reklamationen, Gesuche im Kanton Heinsberg
Roerdepartement, Präfektur (AA 0633) >> 3. Erste Division: Finanzwesen >> 3.1. Erstes Büro: Domänenverwaltung >> 3.1.16. Strittige Sachen, Reklamationen, Gesuche in Domänenangelegenheiten >> 3.1.16.1. Arrondissement Aachen
(1573, 1655) 1805 - 1813
Enthaeltvermerke: Eigentum des Wilhelm Haas und des Matthias Koenigs, Käufer des Domänengutes Haakerhof (Mairie Heinsberg, Commune Unterbruch) an 15 Hektar Ackerland; Entschädigung der Marie Agnes Sophie de Roy, Frau des Charles Chevalier Rentier in Aachen, und der Witwe Maria Gertrud Somya geb. De Roy, Käufer der beiden Höfe Großschafhausen und Kleinschafhausen zu Ophoven (Mairie Birgelen) für Ameliorationen; Mühlenzwang der von Edmund Ludwig Baron von Blanckard, Major in Diensten des Königs von Bayern, erworbenen Mühle in Istraaten (Mairie Breberen) für Breberen, Wehr, Istraaten, Schierwaldenrath, Langbroich, Saffelterberg. Senkung der Pacht des Arnold Frentzen, Bauer zu Steinkirchen, für Teile aus dem Groß- und Kleinschafhauser Hof zu Ophoven; Ansprüche der Mairie Myhl aufWald aus dem Besitz des Klosters Myhl; Pachtgelder der Erben Jansen für Ländereien der Norbertinerinnen zu Heinsberg; Streit zwischen Franz Joseph Küppers und Peter Habes, Käufers des Horsterhofes (ehem. Norbertinerinnen zu Heinsberg) um die sog. Ossenweide; Streit zwischen der Domänenverwaltung und der Commune Wassenberg um das Eigentumsrecht am sog. Tannenbusch; Reklamation des Pächters der kommunalen Mühle von Unterbruch, David Gottfried Schafmann, gegen den geplanten Verkauf als Domänengut
Diverse Registraturbildner
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.