In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Nachbarstreit wegen Wasserabflusses und Reinigung eines Aborts
Enthält: Nachbarstreit wegen Wasserabflusses und Reinigung eines Aborts, beginnend im Jahre 1611. Kläger sind Arnold Wibbeken, Vikar im alten Dom, Herr Henrich Steverman und Henrich Remmen, vertreten durch Prokurator Johan Winckeldei. Nach dem im Winter 1612/13 erfolgten Tode des Wibbeken treten in den Rechtsstreit nun seine Testamentsvollstrecker Herman Voss, Dechant im alten Dom, Melchior Krechting, Kanonikus daselbst, und Vikar Johan Lipper. Beklagte sind der Leinenweber Wilhelm zur Heide und Henrich Rengerinck, vertreten durch Prokurator Franz Peick. Kaspar Remmen ist Rechtsvorgänger des Henrich Remmen, Anton Eppinck der des Wilhelm zur Heide. Die Kläger berufen sich auf einen Vertrag von 1592 zwischen ihnen un der Frau Henrich Rengerinck, geb. Maria Stoetbrock (gest. vor 1599), deren Tochter den Herman Hesselinck geheiratet hat. Am 22. 10. 1610 hat wegen des Streites bereits ein Schöffentag von den Ratsherrn Rutger Osnabrüg, Lic. Dietrich Kirchoff und Johan Schonnbeck stattgefunden. Als Zeugen werden vernommen die Eheleute Berndt Schaepman, die dem zur Heide sein Haus verkauft haben, M. Johan Schmeddingk, Herman Prönnig (Prein oder Preining), Henrich Backhus, Johan Menslage und Henrich Kammers. Erwähnt werden Bernhard Thyer, Notar Bernard Witfelt und Wennemar Lübbers.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
CC0 1.0 Universal