In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Querulationis Auseinandersetzung um Bevorzugung im Konkurs
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 23. 1. Kläger W
(1783) 05.04.1783-20.10.1783
Kläger: (2) chirographische, im Prioritätsurteil nach Nr. VII gesetzte Gläubiger des Wahrendorfschen Konkurses
Beklagter: Handlungshaus Franz Klefecker & Paschen in Hamburg
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Johann David Lembke (A & P) Bekl.: Dr. Johann Christian Koch (A & P), seit 16.10.1783: Dr. Christoph Christian Hasse (A & P)
Fallbeschreibung: Nach Bitte der Kl. vom 05.04. um Fristverlängerung zum Einreichen ihrer Beschwerden gegen ein Ratsgerichtsurteil und erteilter Genehmigung des Tribunals vom 08.04. legen die Bekl. am 12.05. ein Gesuch vor, den Kl.n maximal 8 Tage Aufschub zu gewähren, um restitutio in integrum gegen ein nicht beiliegendes Tribunalsurteil einzulegen. Das Tribunal fordert die Kl. am 14.05. entsprechend dazu auf, die am 05.06. dagegen argumentieren, daß die Bekl. vorrangig vor ihnen befriedigt werden und bitten, sie weiter unter den Gläubigern mit Schuldverschreibungen einzureihen. Am 07.07. bitten die Parteien um Prozeßbeschleunigung, am 20.10.1783 verweist das Tribunal die Parteien auf das am selben Tag ergangene Urteil in dem Fall der Firma Klefecker und Paschen vs. den gemeinsamen Anwalt des Wahrendorfschen Konkurses.
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Prioritätsurteil des Ratsgerichts vom 22.02.1783; von Notar Johann Friedrich Nölting aufgenommene Appellation vom 27.02.1783; Protokoll über Auseinandersetzung in der Wahrendorfschen Konkurssache vom 22.03.1783; Prozeßvollmacht der Bekl. für Dr. Hasse vom 14.10.1783
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
