In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Preußische Akademie der Künste >> 12. Stiftungen >> 12.4. Persönliche Stiftungen
1935 - 1936
Enthält: - Korrespondenz mit der Preußischen Staatsbank (Seehandlung) über die Verwaltung der Wertpapiere. - Gewährung von Unterstützungen an die Meisterschüler Adrian Graf Alegiani mit Korrespondenz zwischen Hugo Lederer und Amersdorffer (Bl. 174-181); Kunz Richter, u.a. Befürwortung von Hugo Lederer (Bl. 38-40, 95-97, 136f., 181-183, 202f., 267-271, 287-289); Gustav Seitz, u.a. Befürwortung von Hugo Lederer (Bl. 16-18, 184f., 203); Berthold Zobel (Bl. 191f.); Rudolf Riester, u.a. Befürwortung von Max Kutschmann (Bl. 284-286); an die Maler A. W. Baum (Bl. 246, 253-255), Erich Büttner (Bl. 86-90) mit Befürwortung von Philipp Franck (Bl. 89, 90); H. A. Franke (Bl. 154, 166-168), Joachim-Karl Friedrich (Bl. 64-66), Hans Jürgen Kallmann (Bl. 11-13, 46-48,142), Hermann Konnerth (Bl. 28-30), Paul Kother und Mara Kother-Mueller (Bl. 50f., 67- 82; v.a. Rezensionen zu Ausstellungen von Mara Kother-Mueller), Oscar Lindner, u.a. Befürwortung von Kautzsch (Bl. 199, 220-224) und Hermann Sandkuhl (Bl. 221, 223); Artur Meyer, u.a. Befürwortung von Kautzsch (Bl. 54-56, 145-147, 236-238, 273-277) und Ad. Strübe (Bl. 277); Fritz Mayer (Bl. 186f.), Hermann J. Mors, u.a. Befürwortung von Ad. Strübe (Bl. 22-25, 109-111, 170-173); Erich Nagel, u.a. Befürwortung von Kautzsch (Bl. 3f., 122f., 257f.); Hildegard Neugebauer (Bl. 124f.), Ernst Wilhelm Nay (Bl. 143, 148-152), F. H. Schröner mit Befürwortung von Max Kutschmann (Bl. 57-60) und Ad. Strübe (Bl. 25); Hermann Schmidt (Bl. 7f. ), Marta Steinbart (Bl. 26), Walter Simsch(Bl. 279), Heinz Trapp (Bl. 41, 138), Hugo Weißer mit Befürwortung von Zaeper (Bl. 206f.); an die Graphiker Walter Bernstein, u.a. Befürwortung von Hans Meid (Bl. 31-34, 126-129, 232. 213f.); Walter Schmock mit Befürwortung von Hans Meid (Bl. 200f.), Elisabeth Voigt (Bl. 169, 230); an die Bildhauer Hermann Blumenthal (Bl. 10, 121, 129-131), Bernhard Brodda mit Befürwortung von Hans Meid (Bl. 159-161): August Draeger (Bl. 98-100), Herbert Ehrich, u.a. Befürwortung von Hugo Lederer (Bl. 163-165, 188-190); Otto Fischer-Credo (Bl. 91, 103-105, Erich Geiseler, u.a. Befürwortung von Fritz Klimsch (Bl. 49, 155, 193-195, 242f., 251f.); Georg Hengstenberg (Bl. 1, 5f., 92-94, 106), Karl Kowalczewski (Bl. 19-21), Wilhelm Löber (Bl. 162), Walter Peter (Bl. 35-37, 262-264), Emy Köcke-Potthoff (Bl. 120, 139-141), Dorothea Schivelbein (Bl. 231), Michael Schoberth (Bl. 144, 156-158, 292), Hannes Schulz (Bl. 42-44, 117-119., 209-211, 239-241, 259-261); Hans Steger (Bl. 132-135), ua. mit Befürwortung von Wilhelm Gerstel; Robert Stieler (Bl. 205, 244f.), Christian Theunert (Bl. 45,112-114, 265f.), Arthur Wellmann (Bl. 247-250).
294 Bl. Microfilm/-fiche: 1385
Archivale
Beschriftung: Registratursignatur: Reg. IV - W 3 - Bd. 4
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
