Kläger: Hans (von) Schack zu Hasenthal, Beklagter: Otto Schack zu Gülzow, Nebenbeklagter: der Herzog von Sachsen-Lauenburg, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Johann Agricola, Lizentiat der Rechte Dietrich Dülmann, Lizentiat der Rechte Peter Paul Steuernagel, Streitgegenstand: Streit um die Behinderung eines von Hans Schack begonnenen Baus einer Windmühle zu Hasenthal durch Otto Schack
Show full title
Kläger: Hans (von) Schack zu Hasenthal, Beklagter: Otto Schack zu Gülzow, Nebenbeklagter: der Herzog von Sachsen-Lauenburg, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Johann Agricola, Lizentiat der Rechte Dietrich Dülmann, Lizentiat der Rechte Peter Paul Steuernagel, Streitgegenstand: Streit um die Behinderung eines von Hans Schack begonnenen Baus einer Windmühle zu Hasenthal durch Otto Schack
LASH, Abt. 390 Nr. 443
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar >> 1 Prozessakten
1623-1625
Enthält: Herzog von Sachsen-Lauenburg 1623, RKG 1623-1625; falsch einsortiertes Aktenstück aus dem Streit des Wasmut Schack mit Helmut Schack 1603-1612 (Abt. 390 Nr. 442; BII. 29-32, 34-35); falsch einsortiertes Aktenstück aus dem Streit des Lüdeke, Peter, Reimer, Friedrich, Franz und Otto Schack zu Prillwitz in Pommern und Hans von Billerbeck in Pommern mit Hans Schack zu (Alten-)Stettin 1621-1623 (BII. 5-10, 13-18; Wetzlarer Signatur: S 915); falsch einsortierte Aktenstücke aus dem seit mindestens 1607 rechtshängigen Streit der Abel Schack, Witwe des Hans Stiegen, mit Helmut Schack, Käufer des Gutes Basthorst 1636-1637 (BII. 65 ff; Wetzlarer Signatur: S 917?)
Verzeichnung
siehe auch Abt. 390 Nr. 444
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
26.01.2026, 12:55 PM CET