In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Der Abt zu Frankenthal und Erkinger von Rodenstein, Amtmann zu Neuleiningen, vidimieren folgende Urkunden: 1) 1314 Mai 7; Abt Bartholomäus von Wei...
Urkunden der Sammlung Haeberlin >> 8 Aus Kurpfälzischen Archiven >> 8.1 Passivlehen der Pfalz
1467 September 7
Pergament mit
Urkunde
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Der Abt zu Frankenthal und Erkinger von Rodenstein, Amtmann zu Neuleiningen, vidimieren folgende Urkunden: 1) 1314 Mai 7; Abt Bartholomäus von Weißenburg gestattet, daß Graf Friedrich v. Leiningen für die Kinder seiner Tochter Elsa, Witwe Emrichs v. Dune, dessen Lehen empfängt. 2) 1354 Dezember 15; Abt Eberhard von Weißenburg belehnt die Grafen Friedrich d. ä. und d. j. von Leiningen, Brüder, mit Weisenheim (a. Sand) und den Zehnten zu Lambsheim. 3) 1370 November 28; Abt Eberhard und das Kapitel zu Weißenburg stimmen zu, daß die Grafen Friedrich d. ä. und der j. (Gattin Jolanthe) v. Leiningen die Orte Grünstadt, Asselheim, Sausenheim und Kirchheim a. Eck an Graf Emich v. Leiningen versetzen. 4) 1370 November 13; Erklärung Graf Emichs über einen Spezialartikel der vorstehenden Urkunde. 5) 1404 März 9; Abt Johann von Veldenz zu Weißenburg belehnt Graf Friedrich v. Leiningen mit Grünstadt, Asselheim, Obrigkeim, Sausenheim, Kirchheim a. Eck, einem Gut zu Wynden, dem Dorfe Sweygen, Dorf und Gericht Weisenheim, Weinzehnten zu Lambsheim. 6) 1434 Oktober 24; Abt Philipp belehnt Graf Friedrich v. Leiningen mit Grünstadt, Asselheim, Obrigkeim, Sausenheim, Kirchheim a. Eck, einem Gut zu Wynden, dem Dorfe Sweygen, Dorf und Gericht Weisenheim, Weinzehnten zu Lambsheim. 7) 1435 Oktober 5; Derselbe belehnt Graf Hesse v. Leiningen mit Grünstadt, Asselheim, Obrigkeim, Sausenheim, Kirchheim a. Eck, einem Gut zu Wynden, dem Dorfe Sweygen, Dorf und Gericht Weisenheim, Weinzehnten zu Lambsheim
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: wohlerhaltene Siegel des Abts zur Frankenthal und Erkingers v. Rodenstein
Ein Indorsat saec. 16. bemerkt, daß diese Lehen nun von Kurpfalz empfangen werden
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.