In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Relationen des Obergerichts >> 01. Gesamte Archivalien
1736
Johann Friedrich Schult contra Jeann Joli in pto debiti. - Niclas Köpke contra die Ehefrau von Peter Lange in pto familiae herciscundae. - Carl Daniel Dahlmann contra den Ratsverwandten Christoff Voigt in pto preferentiae. - Der Prokurator Civitatis contra Christoffer Vehlhering in pto instrumenti. - Caspar Töppen contra Anton Scheffel in pto debiti. - Gabriel Gaden und Consorten contra Johias Matraesere in pto debiti. - Hermann von der Fehr contra Ulrich Christoff Aulert in pto Auseinandersetzung um die Abtretung einiger gekündigter Lott Acker. - Eberhard von der Fehr contra die Erben der Frau des Dr. N N Ahrends in pto Auseinandersetzung um einen Mietvertrag. - Johann Friedrich Frick contra die Vormünder der Kinder von Joachim Froh, insbesondere Joachim Hinrich Allwardt in pto Auseinandersetzung um einen Verkauf. - Ulrich Hans Kruse contra Jacob Wilder, dessen Ehefrau und Sohn aus Lübow in pto Injuriarum. - Hartwig Lübbers, Grubenmüller, und sein Mühlenbursche contra Barthold Jörssen und Johann Hinrich Günther, Losbäckergesellen in pto Auseinandersetzung um Injurien beim Mahlen. - Johann Christian Parlach contra die Kramerkompanie zu Wismar in pto Eingriffs. - Erich Rohwedder und Consorten contra das Amt der Nagelschmiede in pto Auseinandersetzung um verschiedenes. - Amt der Schuster contra die Ehefrau des Ernst Peutzner in pto Auseinandersetzung um angebliche Zusetzung zweier Lehrjungen. - Auseinandersetzung um Konkurs von Johann Dietrich Stemwede. - Das Amt der Schneider contra Johann Jochim Winckelmann in pto Auseinandersetzung um Haltung von 6 Stühlen in der Werkstatt, später Ausschluß aus dem Amt. - Conrad Schröder contra Witwe des Martin Struck in pto Auseinandersetzung um Realinjurien. - Christian Dietrich Alberti und Jochim Friedrich Juhl namens der Kinder des Jochim Hinrich Voigt contra im Testament der Anna Elsabe Voigt genannte Erbberechtigte: das Schwarze Kloster zu Wismar, Erben des Johann Jochim Schade, 3 Töchter des Apothekers N N Wedemeyer zu Neubukow sowie Agneta Elisabeth Jordan in pto Auseinandersetzung um die Aufteilung des Erbes. - Ehefrau des Jürgen Johann Thomsen contra Ehefrau des Jürgen Friedrich Draguhn in pto Auseinandersetzung um Injurien. - Die Witwe von Joachim contra Ilsabe Marie Anders und Maria Koop in pto codiulli
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International