In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Prozesse Lippes gegen Minden um die Lehnshoheit und den Besitz der Ulenburg
Auswärtiger Besitz des Hauses Lippe >> 6. Ulenburg >> 6.2. Streit über die Ulenburg zwischen Minden und Lippe >> 6.2.1. Prozesse bis zur Übergabe
1581-1588
Enthaeltvermerke: enthält v.a.: Prozeßakten, darunter Schreiben Kaiser Rudolfs II. zugunsten Graf Simons VI.; Kautionsangebot durch Graf Johann von Oldenburg; Notariatsinstrument (Perg.) über Kaution des Grafen zur Lippe; Mandat des Reichskammergerichts zugunsten der Erben Quernheim gegen Minden; Unterstützungsschreiben des Landgrafen Wilhelm von Hessen beim Kaiser für Simon zur Lippe; Bischof Hermanns von Minden Einlassung an den Kaiser gegen Graf Simon; kaiserliche und Mandate des Reichshofrates gegen Minden (1581/2); kaiserliches Mandat zur Exekution gegen Minden an den Herzog von Jülich; mehrfache Bitten um Aufschub nach Rücktritt des Bischofs von Minden; Intervention Graf Simons bei Rudolf II.; weiteres Mandat des Kaisers gegen Minden; Bitten Simons an den Herzog von Jülich um Ausführung des Mandats; Bericht der kaiserlichen Kommissare (vgl. dazu auch L 51 Nr. 57) über ihre Abweisung vor der Ulenburg; Simons Intervention beim Kreistag und bei Rudolf II. (1583); Verhandlungen zwischen Jülich und Minden; Bitten Simons an den Reichsvizekanzler und den Kaiser um Exekution gegen Minden; Kostenaufstellungen des Kommissars Heinrich Meinders gegenüber Graf Simon; weitere Eingaben Simons um Exekution (1588); erneutes Mandat Rudolfs II. enthält auch: Notariatsinstrument (Perg.) mit inserierten Lehnreversen der Quernheimer (vgl. L 51 Nr. 50)
Auswärtiger Besitz
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.