Kläger: Dr. Johann Bunsow, Prokurator am mecklenburgischen Hofgericht in Rostock und Jürgen von Bibow zu Berendshagen für den inhaftierten Eggert von Bibow, Beklagter: Herzog Franz II. von Sachsen-Lauenburg, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Bernhard Kühorn, Dr. Johann Melchior Reinhardt, Streitgegenstand: Verhaftung des Eggert von Bibow ohne rechtliches Gehör

Show full title
Landesarchiv Schleswig-Holstein
Data provider's object view
LASH, Abt. 390 Nr. 35
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar >> 1 Prozessakten
1593-1601
Enthält: RKG 1593-1601; Konstitution von 1584 (Kommissionsprotokoll, Beilage C Nr. 2); Bestallungsurkunde für Eggert von Bibow und sein Amtseid 1597 (Kommissionsprotokoll Beilagen A-B); Suppliken an den Herzog mit Beschwerden über Eggert von Bibow 1591-1592 (Kommissionsprotokoll); Protokoll der von Herzog Franz II. 1591 eingsetzten Kommission, bestehend aus Herzog August von Sachsen-Lauenburg, Otto von Wackerbarth, Domprobst zu Schwerin, Hans von Dalldorf zu Wotersen, Lorenz von Schack zu Hasenthal, Veit von Hitzacker, Großvogt von Lauenburg, Dr. Johann Wilhelm Neunebel (Neunobel), Kanzler, Franz Brackelmann, Rat des Herzogs, als Richtern über die vom Fiskal zusammengetragenen Vorwürfe gegen Eggert von Bibow ; Notariatsinstrumente von 1593 (Q 10); Schreiben des Herzogs Ulrich von Mecklenburg an den Herzog von Sachsen-Lauenburg 1594 (Kommissionsprotokoll 04.01.1594)
Verzeichnung
siehe auch Abt. 390 Nr. 34

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Es gelten die gesetzlichen Bestimmungen des Landesarchivs Schleswig-Holstein.
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
26.01.2026, 12:52 PM CET
Landesarchiv Schleswig-Holstein
Data provider's object view

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Landesarchiv Schleswig-Holstein