In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Pachtnachlaßgesuche von Pächtern aus den Kantonen Elsen, Neersen, Neuss, Odenkirchen und Uerdingen aus der französischen Zeit
AA 0635 Generalgouvernement vom Nieder- und Mittelrhein (AA 0635)
Generalgouvernement vom Nieder- und Mittelrhein (AA 0635) >> 11. 11. Kreisdirektionen >> 11.14. 12.9. Domänenverpachtungen
1797–1805 (1817)
Enthaeltvermerke: Heft 1: Joh. Wilhelm Bonsel in Neersen, Pächter der Gippermühle Jahr 7–9 (1798– 1801); Heft 2: Chretien Pesch, Gerard Bungartz, Jacques Wolff, Adam Nagel, Winand Angermund, Witwe Engel Rosellen, Antoine Ohmen, Antoine Becker, Catharina Schumacher, Leonard Dicken, Jacques Riesdorfund Jean Wolff aus Neukirchen, Mairie Hülchrath, Parzellenpächter des ehem. Kloster Langwaden Jahr 11–12 (1803–1804, 1810); Heft 3: Math. Anton Bocken, Müller in Süchteln Jahr 10–12 (1801–1803); Heft 4: Witwe Eckertz, Pächterin der Liedberger Windmühle Jahr 11–13 (1803–1805); Heft 5: Pierre Titz in Hoisten, Parzellenpächter des ehem. Kloster Eppinghoven (1790) Jahr 11–13 (1803–1804); Heft 6: Johann Jäger, Parzellenpächter in Hülchrath (1789) Jahr 7–9 (1798, 1801); Heft 7: Jean Vetten und Jean Kamps, Pächter in Neukirchen, Kanton Elsen Jahr 7–8 (1799); Heft 8: Balthasar Gilles, Pächter des Werthhofs in Nierst / ehem. Kloster Meer (1792, 1802) Jahr 11–13 (1803, 1805); Heft 9: Engel Rosellen und Co. in Neukirchen, Kanton Elsen; Adolph Fasbender, Pächter des Nixhofes in Gubberath (ehem. Kloster Langwaden) (1751) Jahr 7–12 (1798–1800, 1803); Heft 10: Joh. Matthias Flünnertz, Pächter des Herbertzhofs in Ossum Jahr 7–10 (1799–1802); Heft 11: Michael Sassen, Pächter des Walscheider Hofs in Uedesheim Jahr 8–9 (1800); Heft 12: Wilhelm Reinartz, Pächter in Heerdt (ehem. Stift St. Quirin, Neuss) (1797) Jahr 11– 13 (1802–1804); Heft 13: Jakob Schmitz, Pächter in Grefrath, Kanton Neuss Jahr 7 (1798–1799); Heft 14: Paul Scheuren, Pächter des Doktorshofs in Oberlörick; Joh. Schärzgen, Pächter des Sommershofs in Büderich; Peter Schweden, Pächter in Uedesheim Jahr 8 (1800); Heft 15: Conrad Gripenkoven, Pächter des Hofs Sudenrath in Dahlen (ehem. Stift St. Maria im Kapitol in Köln) (1796) Jahr 11–12 (1802–1803); Heft 16: Joh. Rath, Pächter in Waat (ehem. Kreuzbrüder, Düsseldorf) (1797) Jahr 10–11 (1802); Heft 17: Mathias Zenzes, Pächter des Merreterhofs in Dahlen (ehem. Stift St. Maria im Kapitol, Köln) (1795) Jahr 11–12 (1802–1803); Heft 18: Jakob Schmitz, Zehntpächter in Holzheim bei Neuss (1796) Jahr 6 (1798–1799); Heft 19: Ad. Dahmen, Mühlenpächter in Odenkirchen Jahr 8–11 (1799–1802).
Diverse Registraturbildner
19 Hefte;
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.