In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage auf Ausführung eines Urteils des Hofrats vom 20. Juni 1732 gegen den Grafen Anton von Hatzfeldt zu Overbach wegen einer Erbrente und rückständiger Pensionen seit 1707.
Klage auf Ausführung eines Urteils des Hofrats vom 20. Juni 1732 gegen den Grafen Anton von Hatzfeldt zu Overbach wegen einer Erbrente und rückständiger Pensionen seit 1707.
Reichskammergericht, Teil III: E-G >> 2. Buchstabe F
1734 (1732-1734)
Enthaeltvermerke: Kläger: Arnold Wolfgang und Franz Winand von Frentz zu Schlenderhan (Schlenderhahn) Beklagter: Karl Philipp Pfalzgraf bei Rhein als Herzog zu Jülich und sein Hofrat zu Düsseldorf Prokuratoren (Kl.): Dr. Johann Jacob Zwirlein 1733 - Subst.: Lic. Wilhelm Ludwig Ziegler Prozeßart: Mandati de non impediendo cursum executionis rei judicatae nec avocando eam a judicio ordinario competente sed exequendo proprium iudicatum cum clausula Instanzen: RKG 1734 (1732-1734) Beweismittel: Urteil des Hofrats von 1732 (Q 4). Beschreibung: 17 Bl., lose; Q 1-5, 1 Beilage.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
