In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
7/13,1 [Nr. 25,1]: Streitigkeiten zwischen den Erben des Prof. iur. Johann Harpprecht und dem Buchdrucker Philibert Brunn d. J. wegen des Druckvertrages der"Institution Justinini".
7/13,1 [Nr. 25,1]: Streitigkeiten zwischen den Erben des Prof. iur. Johann Harpprecht und dem Buchdrucker Philibert Brunn d. J. wegen des Druckvertrages der"Institution Justinini".
UAT 7/ Ältere Universitätsregistratur, Vermischte Sachakten (II)
Ältere Universitätsregistratur, Vermischte Sachakten (II) >> 10. Bücheredition (1554-1809) >> Bücheredition, Fasz. I: Nr. 1-45
(1648), 1654
Enthält: Bl. 68-69v: Joh. Christoph Harpprecht d. Ä. (Enkel des Prof. iur Joh. Harpprecht) für sich und als Kurator seiner minderjährigen Schwestern Agnes Maria und Rosina Maria, Agnes Mündlein geb. Harpprecht, Witwe und Rosina Meier geb. Harpprecht, Witwe (Uss. e.) an die Universität, s.d.: Prof. Joh. Harpprecht vermehrte und verbesserte laufend seine 4 tomos Institutionum Iustiniani und befahl seiner Tochter Marie Rümelin, eine Neuausgabe zu besorgen. Im Jahr 1648 erbot sich der verstorbene Philibert Brunn dazu gegen 25 Frei-Exemplare im Wert von je 6 fl. an die Erben, also jeden Zweig 5. Dann verkaufte er das Werk in Frankfurt und bezahlte nur Frau Rümelin und den jungen Ranzenbach, Harpprechts Tochtersohn und ein wenig an Joh. Christoph Harpprecht, d. h. er befriedigte von den 5 Zweigen nur 2. Er bitte, den jungen Philibert Brunn als Erben seines Vaters zur Erfüllung des Vertrags anzuhalten. e. von Joh. Christoph Harpprecht. Bl. 69v: Decr. Sen. 14.9.1654: geht an Phil. Brunn zur Verantwortung. v. a. Hd. : Das Buch wird mit ehestem zu Frankfurt gedruckt werden.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.