In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Mandatum de solvendo Auseinandersetzung um die Bezahlung von Schulden
Wismarer Tribunal >> 01. Prozeßakten >> 01.08. 1. Kläger H
(1593-1662) 16.09.1668-30.04.1669
Kläger: (2) Gläubiger des Claus Horn auf Wahlendow, namentlich die Petrikirche in Wolgast, Witwe Blixen, Witwe Steding, Witwe Martin Mollers, Witwe Simon Hermanns, Erben Radelows, Oberst Weißenstein, Witwe Caspar Maschows und Witwe Johann Papkes
Beklagter: Anna von Keffenbrink, Witwe des Majors Anders Ritfeld
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Caspar Hoyer (A), Dr. Hinrich Schabbelt (P) Bekl.: Dr. Caspar Friedrich Koch (P)
Fallbeschreibung: Wegen ihrer Forderung von 2.000 fl. an Daniel Bröker sind die Kl. an den Konkurs Claus Horns verwiesen worden. Da mittlerweile die Bekl. auf Gut Rieht sitzt, bitten die Kl., sie zur Bezahlung der 1.000 fl. anzuweisen. Das Tribunal erläßt am 17.09. das gewünschte Mandat cum clausula sub poena immissionis. Am 10.11. bittet die Bekl. um Fristverlängerung zur Antwort, die sie am 16.11.1668 erhält. Am 07.01.1669 bitten die Kl. um Durchsetzung des Mandates, da sich die Bekl. bisher nicht gemeldet hat. Das Tribunal erneuert sein Mandat am 08.01. mit 6wöchige Zahlungsfrist. Am 22.02.1669 ergreift die Bekl. dagegen restitutio in integrum und bittet um Verweisung des Falls an das zuständige Pommersche Hofgericht, am 26.09.1669 folgt das Tribunal diesem Antrag.
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Prioritätsurteil des Greifswalder Hofgerichts über den Konkurs des Claus Horn vom 09.09.1656; Auszug aus dem vom Tribunal bestätigten Vergleich vom 18.08.1662; Bestätigung einer Obligation des Daniel Broker auf Rieth über 1.000 fl. durch Bogislaw XIII. für seinen Neffen Philipp Julius von Pommern vom 01.12.1593; Obligation Daniel Brökers auf Rieth über 1.000 fl. bei der Wolgaster Kirche vom 11.11.1593; Urteil der Pommerschen Landesregierung vom 20.05.1650
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
