In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Dr. Schwarz in Greifswald contra den ehemaligen Wirthschaftsführer Kähler. - Der Ratsverwandte Hackermann in Barth contra den Advocat Voß in Stralsund. - Der Eigentümer Ehlert contra den Eigentümer Müther. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Schuhmacher Friedrich Johann Adolph Christian Braun. - Friederike von Homeyer in Grimmen contra den Assessor des Oberlandesgericht Amadeus Odebrecht. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Bröcker und den Victualienhändler Schult. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Christian Ferdinand Kettner, den Maureramtsbruder Christoph Jacob Ostenbrügge und Maurergesellen Johann Martin Nehls zu Loitz. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Schustergesellen Carl Fritz zu Grimmen. - Die verordneten Curatoren der von Usedom Tetzizer Verlassenschaft ad. Decretum Regii Dicasterii Pomeranici vom 5. Dezember 1840. - Der Gutsbesitzer Hinrichs contra seine Ehefrau. - Der Büdner Engelbrecht contra die Pomemrsche Brandversicherung. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Carl Friedrich Ohlrich. - Bürgermeister Dr. Okel zu Tribsees contra den Wundarzt Preuss. - Der Stellmacher Heitmann contra den Büdner Knaack. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Gärtner Keilmann zu Züsow. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Michael Friedrich Hauschild. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Vagabund Johann Michael Schmurr. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Wilhelm Brabant. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Dienstknecht Johan Carl Daniel Breuhahn. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Johan Friedrich Barthels und dessen Stiefsohn Joachim Christian Chrstoph Sass. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Maurergesellen Joachim Christoph Braesel. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Friedrich Christoph Carl School. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Friedrich Philipp Theodor Plümer
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International