In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Supplicationis Auseinandersetzung um Verkauf von Acker
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 02. 1. Kläger B
12.09.1771-08.10.1771
Kläger: (2) Cand jur. Dietrich Carl Bohse zu Wismar
Beklagter: Lic. jur. Joachim Heinrich Scheffel, gemeiner Anwalt des Bohseschen Konkurses
Fallbeschreibung: In der Konkursmasse des verstorbenen Bruders des Kl.s befindet sich ein Acker vor dem Poeler Tor, der den Brüdern gemeinsam gehört. Kl. erbittet den Verkauf dieses Ackers zu seinen Gunsten und bietet an, auf anderen gemeinschaftlichen Besitz im entsprechenden Gegenwert zugunsten der Konkursmasse zu verzichten. Das Tribunal fordert Bekl. am 17.09. zur Antwort binnen 8 Tagen auf, am 19.09. meldet Bekl., daß er einen Käufer für den Acker gefunden hat, der 240 Rtlr bezahlen will und bittet um Zustimmung des Tribunals zum Verkauf, den er am 20.09. erhält. Am 25.09. berichtet Bekl. von Abwicklung des Verkaufs und Auszahlung des halben Kaufpreises an Kl. Am 26.09. erbittet Bekl. im Namen des Käufers Bestätigung des Kaufvertrages und erreicht dies am 04.10. Am 08.10.1771 informiert Kl. über die Auslieferung seiner Obligation an Bekl., das Tribunal nimmt dies ad acta.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1771
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Schreiben des Bekl. an Gläubiger des Postmeisters Bohse vom 17.09.1771 mit Stellungnahmen von Johann Franz von Palthen vom 17.09.1771, Dr. Joachim Christoph Ungnade und Dr. Christoph Erich Hertzberg vom 18.09.1771, Dr. Johann David Lembcke vom 19.09.1771; Quittung des Kl.s über 120 Rtlr vom 24.09.1771; Kaufvertrag über ein Lott Acker auf dem Kagenmarkt vom 23.09.1771; Quittung des Bekl. über Empfang einer Obligation des Kl.s vom 24.09.1771
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
