In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Rechtsstreitigkeiten wegen der reichsunmittelbaren Grafschaft Limburg-Styrum
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Brief des Richters Peter Sarbols (1518); Brief des Drosten Derick Momme von Kell (1432); Abschrift eines Vergleichs zwischen Erich Grafen zu Limburg und Bronckhorst und Johann Jacob Graf zu Bronckhorst-Batenburg wegen der Herrschaft Myllendonk (08.10.1624); Abschrift einer Vollmacht Ottos Graf zu Holstein-Schauenburg für die Räte Johann Tielmann und Georg Rauen (14.06.1636); Revers des Dr. jur. Wilhelm Terbeck (24.05.1640); Abschrift einer Schreibens König Christians IV. von Dänemark vom August 1642 wegen der anheimgefallenen Herrschaft Pinnenberg; Differenzen zwischen den Grafen von Bronckhorst und der Äbtissin zu Elten (1652-1659); Abschriften von Pachtverträgen des Wilhelm von Nesselrode und Bertram von Nesselrode zu Herten (1607, 1609); Abschriften der Nesselrodischen Erbpachtzettel über Mallandt und Lomans Hof (1609); Beilegung von Differenzen zwischen dem Grafen von Styrum und der Herzogin von Aarschot und Croy vor dem Gericht zu Kleve (1660-1662). Korrespondenten u.a.: Dr. Wilhelm Terbeck, Willem van Haarsolt, Jost Hermann Graf zu Holstein, Georg Ernst Graf zu Limburg-Bronckhorst-Styrum, Temminck, Dr. Johann Peil (Kleve), Sekretär Anton Crämer; Dr. Hermann Pabst (Kleve), Dr. Hermann Ernst (Kleve), Wilferd Erhardt (Kleve), Bernhard Becker, Henrick Hunteler.
145 Bl.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.