Relationen des Wismarer Obergerichts 1845
Show full title
0145
Abt. VI. Rep. 3. C Relationen des Obergerichts
Relationen des Obergerichts >> 01. Gesamte Archivalien
1845
Christ. Allhusen in New Castle contra Consul C. Fr. Kröplien in pto Debiti. - Untersuchungssachen wider den Maurerhandlanger Friedrich Johann Christoph Niemann in pto Gänsediebstahls. - Schenkwirt Maass contra den Schneideramtsmeister Sperling in pto inhibitorii. - Untersuchungssachen wider den Lohndiener Johann Ernst Hartwig Ziesemer in pto Betruges. - Thurmdecker Kirchhof contra die Ehefrau Schauspielhausaufsehers Meinke in pto Schuld. - Charlotte Maria Dorothea Schatt contra ihren Ehemann Heinrich Friederich Schatt in pto Ehescheidung. - Eigentümer C. Erichson contra Schiffsbaumeister Hammer jun. in pto Debiti. - Müllergeselle Kleinmann contra Müllermeister Heidtmann in pto Schadenersatz. - Zimmeramtsältester Bannow und der Zimmeramtsmeister Friedrich Bannow contra die übrigen Meister des Hauszimmeramtes in pto Aufgabe eines Meisterstückes. - Untersuchungssachen wider den Maurerhandlanger Joachim Friedrich Christopf Niemann in pto Unterschlagung eines Paares Schuhe. - Untersuchungssachen wider Johannes Martin Amandus Weber in pto Diebstahls. - Tuchhändler Bischoff contra die Ehefrau des Schneidermeisters Neumann in pto Schuld. - Erbpächter Hanck zu Müggenburg contra Knecht Christoph Behrens in pto Dienstvergehung und Drohung. - Fischer Johann David Heinrich Albrecht contra seine Ehefrau Friederika Dorothea Elisabeth Albrecht in pto Ehescheidung. - Maria Christiane Fälcker contra ihren Ehemann Heinrich Bernhard Wilhelm Fälcker. - Älterleute des Schneideramtes contra Schneideramtsmeister Steltzer in pto Beleidigung der Älterleute in der Amtsversammlung. - Erbpächter Hanck zu Müggenburg contra Knecht Heinrich Porath in pto Dienstwidrigkeiten. - Untersuchungssachen wider Johann Sjögreen und Consorten in pto Diebstahls
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
29.10.2025, 11:29 AM CET
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International