In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Zeugenaussage über Beratungen zwischen den Markgrafen von Meißen und Kassel
Urk. 13 Generalrepertorium [ehemals: Urkunden A I t]
Generalrepertorium [ehemals: Urkunden A I t] >> Betreffe K >> 1 Ka >> 1.4 Kassel, Stadt >> 1.4 3 1385-1399
1390 März 27
Ausfertigung, Pergament, 14 Siegel (alle Siegel ab, Siegel 10 ab und verloren)
Urkunde
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Eckbrecht von Grifte, Ritter, und Heinrich von Uslacht bekennen, dass sie vor Landgraf Hermann von Hessen und vor seinen Freunden, nämlich Junker Burkhard von Schöneberg, Herrn Kraft Vogt von Fronhausen, Herrn Johann von Schwalbach, Ritter, Otto Groppe von Gudensberg, Johann von der Malsburg, Heinrich Schenk von Schweinsberg, Thiele Wolff von Gudensberg, Friedrich von Hertingshausen, Kuno von (Nidenhusen), Wigand von Gilsa, Otto von Holzhausen und Hans (uffme Reyne) eidlich Zeugnis darüber abgelegt haben, dass sie von Bernhard von Dalwigk und von Johann Harbusch gebeten wurden, bei den Teidingen dabei zu sein. Sie wiederholen die Aussage des Johann vor dem Landgrafen über die Beratungen zwischen Kassel und dem Markgrafen. Mit ihnen besiegeln das Zeugnis die obengenannten zwölf Personen.
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.