In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Bestallungen des Matthias von Kleen, Johann Adolf von
Höpken und Dietrich von Stade zum Archivar
Enthält: - Protokoll und Bestallung des Generalauditeurs Matthias von Kleen zum Archivar vom 28. Februar 1710 nach dem Tod des Archivars Joachim von Braun; Protokoll vom 14. März 1710 wegen Beeidigung von Kleens; Verfügung der Regierung vom 4. April 1710 wegen Änderung des Titels in der Bestallung Kleens - Protokoll vom 23. Mai 1710 wegen Ernennung Kleens zum Amtmann in Hagen und Bestallung des Johann Adolf von Höpken, Sohn des Gräfen im Alten Land, zum neuen Archivar, sowie Bestallung für Höpken vom selben Tag; Protokoll vom 30. Mai 1710 wegen Beeidigung von Höpkens - Protokoll und Bestallung des Konsistorialsekretärs Dietrich von Stade auf das vakante Archivariat vom 14. Juli 1711; Protokoll vom 17. Juli 1711 wegen Beeidigung von Stades
Verzeichnung
Kleen, Matthias von, Archivar, Bestallung Höpken, Johann Adolf von, Archivar, Bestallung Stade, Dietrich von, Archivar, Bestallung Braun, Joachim von, Archivar
Hagen, Amtmann, Ernennung
Bestallungen, Archivare Archivare, Bestallungen
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.