Einigung zwischen Kloster Haina und Cappel über die 'Menweide' zu Lendorf

Show full title
Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg
Data provider's object view
Urk. 18, 124
Urk. 18, Urk. A II Kl. Cappel a1269
Urk. 18 Kloster Spieskappel - [ehemals: A II]
Kloster Spieskappel - [ehemals: A II] >> 1260-1269
Lendorf, 1269 Juli 10
Ausf. Perg., die untere Hälfte durch Hitze zerstört und vollst. aufgeklebt. - Urspr. anh. Sg. ab
Urkunde
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: Actum in Lintdorf anno domini M. cc. Lxix. in die Septem fratrum

Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Abt Heinrich und der Konvent von Haina (Hegene) bekunden, daß im Streit mit Abt und Konvent von Cappel über die zu Lendorf (Lintdorf) gelegenen 'Menweide' genannten Weiden sich beide Parteien dahingehend geeinigt haben, daß Cappel auf alle Ansprüche (omni actioni) an Äckern, Wiesen, Weiden, Gehölzen und Gewässern verzichtet und dafür von Haina als Ersatz einige 'Semeide' genannte Äcker (quosdam agros qui Semeide wlgaliter nuncupantur) zu Eigentumsrecht erhält.

Vermerke (Urkunde): Rückvermerk: ---

Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Abt Johann von Cappel

Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: die Hainaer Priester und Mönche (sacerdotes et monachi) Bruder Heinrich Prior, Bruder Ludwig von Neukirchen (de noua ecclesia), Bruder Bertram, Bruder Eckehard

Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: die Hainaer 'confratres' Bruder Heinrich von Köln (Colonia), Bruder Ernst

Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Johann Pleban in Lendorf

Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: die Cappeler Brüder Ludwig Stolle (Stollo), Gerlach

Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Kloster Haina

Vermerke (Urkunde): Weitere Überlieferung: Abschrift Kopiar K 270, 105v; 107r, daraus die obigen Angaben ergänzt

Vermerke (Urkunde): Druckangaben: Regest der Cappeler Gegenurkunde: Franz: Kloster Haina (wie Nr.11) 1 Nr.536

Vermerke (Urkunde): Literatur: List: Stift Spieskappel (wie Nr.1) S.208

Vermerke (Urkunde): Literatur: Küther: OL Fritzlar-Homberg (wie Nr.3) S.185

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
10.06.2025, 9:13 AM CEST
Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg
Data provider's object view

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg