Kläger: Graf Christian Detlef Rantzau zu Breitenburg, kaiserlicher Geheimrat, Beklagter: Graf Wilhelm Adolph Rantzau, königlicher Kammerherr, Nebenbeklagte: die Landesfürsten, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Johann Friedrich Hofmann, Dr. Johann Ulrich von Gülich, Lizentiat der Rechte Conrad Franz (von) Steinhausen, Streitgegenstand: Streit unter den Brüdern Christian Detlef und Wilhelm Adolph um Apanage-Zahlungen, um die Mobilien und Effekten ihres Vaters Graf Detlef und um den Nachlass ihrer Großmutter Gräfin Margaretha, Frau des Grafen Christian Rantzau, auch um die Herausgabe entsprechender Nachlass-Inventare durch Graf Christian Detlef
Show full title
Kläger: Graf Christian Detlef Rantzau zu Breitenburg, kaiserlicher Geheimrat, Beklagter: Graf Wilhelm Adolph Rantzau, königlicher Kammerherr, Nebenbeklagte: die Landesfürsten, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Johann Friedrich Hofmann, Dr. Johann Ulrich von Gülich, Lizentiat der Rechte Conrad Franz (von) Steinhausen, Streitgegenstand: Streit unter den Brüdern Christian Detlef und Wilhelm Adolph um Apanage-Zahlungen, um die Mobilien und Effekten ihres Vaters Graf Detlef und um den Nachlass ihrer Großmutter Gräfin Margaretha, Frau des Grafen Christian Rantzau, auch um die Herausgabe entsprechender Nachlass-Inventare durch Graf Christian Detlef
LASH, Abt. 390 Nr. 405
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar >> 1 Prozessakten
1711-1715
Enthält: Landgericht 1711-1712, RKG 1712-1715; Verleihung des Reichsgrafenstandes an Christian Rantzau 1650 (Q 18); testamentarische Disposition der Gräfin Margaretha Rantzau, 1657, Vergleiche 1662-1663 (Q 10); Prozessschrift 1712 (Q 9); Prozesskostenaufstellung 1711-1712 (Q 33); Präzedenzurteile: Benedict von Ahlefeldt zu Lehmkuhlen und des Baltzer von Ahlefeldt zu Heiligenstedten mit Margarethe Hedwig von Ahlefeldt, Witwe des Detlef von Ahlefeldt, Amtmann zu Tondern, 1680 und Verfahren über den Konkurs des Dr. Theodor Friedrich Volckmar, Landsyndikus, 1711 (Q 7)
Verzeichnung
siehe auch Abt. 390 Nr. 100
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
26.01.2026, 1:00 PM CET