1. Matthias v. Kerckerinck zu Stapel; 2. Joh. Kerckerinck, Kan. zu St. Mauritz; 3. Berthold Dietr. Kerckerinck, Kan. zu St. Johann, Osnabrück; 4. Bernh. Kerckerinck, Propst zu Clarholz, Kl. gegen Dietr. Wennemar v. Althaus, Nordwalde, seit 1721 Alex. Jos. Franz Anton v. Althaus, Bekl. Streit um die von Joh. Eberh. v. Bock zu Grevinghoff vererbte Hälfte des Zehnten zu Sandrup. 1. Regierung Münster 1677. 2. RKG 1699
Show full title
1. Matthias v. Kerckerinck zu Stapel; 2. Joh. Kerckerinck, Kan. zu St. Mauritz; 3. Berthold Dietr. Kerckerinck, Kan. zu St. Johann, Osnabrück; 4. Bernh. Kerckerinck, Propst zu Clarholz, Kl. gegen Dietr. Wennemar v. Althaus, Nordwalde, seit 1721 Alex. Jos. Franz Anton v. Althaus, Bekl. Streit um die von Joh. Eberh. v. Bock zu Grevinghoff vererbte Hälfte des Zehnten zu Sandrup. 1. Regierung Münster 1677. 2. RKG 1699
929
F 001 Reichskammergericht - Akten
Reichskammergericht - Akten >> 3. Kläger, z.T. Beklagte C, K
1699
Enthaeltvermerke: Darin: 61 Urkundenabschriften betr. Haus Sentmaring, 1300-1702: 5. Nov. 1300, Bischof Eberhard belehnt Dietr. Borste und seine Frau Jutta mit Haus Sentmaring; 14. Mai 1338, Bischof Ludwig belehnt Wessel Borste und seine Frau Kunigunde; 29. Aug. 1383, Bischof Heidenreich belehnt Harbertus de Stuterslo; 30. März 1430, Bischof Heinr. v. Moers belehnt Bernd Kerckerinck und Gerwin de Bück usw.
Sachakte
Vgl. Wetzlarische Nebenstunden T. 10 S. 133 ff.
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
09.01.2026, 11:16 AM CET
Hierarchy
Hierarchy detail view
- Landesarchiv Nordrhein-Westfalen. Abteilung Westfalen
- Landesarchiv NRW Abteilung Westfalen (Archivtektonik)
- 1. Territorien des Alten Reiches bis 1802/03 einschließlich Kirchen, Stifter, Klöster, Städte u.ä. (Archival tectonics)
- 1.6. Außerwestfälische Territorien und Institutionen (F) (Archival tectonics)
- Reichskammergericht (Archival tectonics)
- Reichskammergericht / Akten (Archival holding)
- 3. Kläger, z.T. Beklagte C, K (Classification)