In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage (vor dem Stadtrichter) des Herman Schenckinck gegen seinen Vetter Berndt von der Wieck. Der Kläger verlangt Rückgabe des Guts, das seine Eltern laut Anlage dem Beklagten und seinem Bruder mit den Recht des Wiederkaufs verkauft haben.
Klage (vor dem Stadtrichter) des Herman Schenckinck gegen seinen Vetter Berndt von der Wieck. Der Kläger verlangt Rückgabe des Guts, das seine Eltern laut Anlage dem Beklagten und seinem Bruder mit den Recht des Wiederkaufs verkauft haben.
Darin: Anlage: 28.9.1493 (in profesto Michaelis) Johann Schenckinck des verstorbenen Hermans Sohn, und Frau Mette verkaufen den Brüdern Engelbert und Bernd von der Wieck ihren Hof to der Alstede im Kspl. Albersloh für 700 Goldgulden, behalten sich aber das Recht vor, für diese Summe den Hof zurückzunehmen. Die Käufer dürfen kein Holz auf dem Hof schlagen. Zeugen: Johan von der Tinnen und Hinrik von der Wieck.
Enthält: Er fordert weiter Schadensersatz, weil der Beklagte große Mengen Holz auf dem Gut geschlagen hat. Er führt aus, es habe sich um eine Verpfändung des Gutes gehandelt.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
