In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Supplicationis Auseinandersetzung um Rückgabe einer Kaution
Wismarer Tribunal >> 01. Prozeßakten >> 01.05. 1. Kläger E
(1754) 24.03.1757-28.05.1757
Kläger: (2) Friedrich Evert von Kahlden auf Daschow
Beklagter: Caspar Christoph von Gagern auf Frankenthal
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. David Gottlieb Ike (A), Dr. Joachim Christoph Ungnade (P) Bekl.: Johann Schlichtkrull (A), Johann Franz von Palthen (P)
Fallbeschreibung: Der Kl. hat für den Bruder des Bekl. Christian Hinrich gebürgt, diese Bürgschaft sollte aber nach geschlossenem Vergleich zwischen den Brüdern vom Bekl. zu Petri 1755 an den Kl. ausgeliefert werden. da das bisher nicht geschehen ist, bittet der Kl. um ein Mandat an den Kl., ihm die Bürgschaftserklärung zurückzugeben. Das Tribunal erläßt dieses Mandat am 26.03.1757 cum clausula. Am 12.05. bittet der Bekl. um Auslieferung der Bürgschaftserklärungen des Kl.s und anderer Bürgen, da auch die Nebenprozesse endlich mit Vergleichen beendet worden sind. Am 13.05. entscheidet das Tribunal, zunächst den gemeinsamen Anwalt der Frankenthalschen Gläubiger zu befragen, ob er mit der Rückgabe der Kautionserklärungen einverstanden sei. Am 26.05. beweist der Bekl., daß er dem Mandat gefolgt ist, das Tribunal nimmt dies am 27.05.1757 ad acta.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1757
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Erklärung des Bekl. vom 25.06.1754; Auszug aus dem Vergleich zwischen dem Bekl. und Ehrenfried Hinrich Richter vom 03.05.1757; von Notar C. Steffen ausgestellte Übergabequittung für ein TRibunalsmandat vom 21.05.1757
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
