In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Schriftstücke zur Sache gegen Bernd Boetel aus dem Jahre 1546.
Enthält u.a.: a) mehrere Schreiben des Bischofs Franz (v. Waldeck) von Münster an den Rat; b) Schreiben des Borchard von Salder, Amtmann zu Lawenstein, an den Bischof. Er gibt das ihm durch Heinrich von Trier übermittelte Ersuchen des Bischofs um Verhaftung des Boetel weiter an den zuständigen Amtmann von Homborch, namens Theodorich Wiedemeier. Dieser berichtet über die Gefangennahme. Dankschreiben des Bischofs. c) Passporte und Vollmachten des Bischofs für den Lic. Gerhard von Welvelde, Erich von Grubenhagen, Amtmann zu Haus Berge, den Dorwechter Hans von Geringen und den Stadtsekretär Franz von Werne, die die Auslieferung des Boetel betreiben sollen. d) Geleitbrief des Bernhard von Mila, Stadthalters in Wolfenbüttel für den Transport des Boetel nach Münster; ferner Ausfertigung des Vergleichs zu Bielefeld vom Jahr 1539. Erwähnt werden Dr. Jost Rulandt in Petershagen; Herman von Mengessel; Dries Strunck; Hinrick Schotte, Sohn des in Horstmar gefangenen Boten Sander Schotte; bischöflicher Sekretär Eberhard von Glev. (Elen?)
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
CC0 1.0 Universal