In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Anspruch auf Zahlung der Reichssteuern durch die Stadt Soest und Streit um die Frage ihrer Reichsunmittelbarkeit. Die Beklagten geben an, Soest sei seit Menschengedenken eine Stadt der Herzöge von Kleve und Grafen von der Mark.
Anspruch auf Zahlung der Reichssteuern durch die Stadt Soest und Streit um die Frage ihrer Reichsunmittelbarkeit. Die Beklagten geben an, Soest sei seit Menschengedenken eine Stadt der Herzöge von Kleve und Grafen von der Mark.
Reichskammergericht, Teil III: E-G >> 2. Buchstabe F
1549 - 1565 (1444 - 1563)
Enthaeltvermerke: Kläger: Der Kaiserliche Fiskal Beklagter: Herzog Wilhelm von Jülich, Kleve und Berg und Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Soest Prokuratoren (Kl.): Lic. Valentin Gottfried (1549) - Dr. Jakob Huckel (1550) - Dr. Michael Vollandt (1563) Prokuratoren (Bekl.): Dr. Ludwig Ziegler (1549) - Lic. Amandus Wolff (1549) - Dr. Johann Portius 1560 - Dr. Alexander Reiffsteck 1560 Prozeßart: Causa exemptionis (Mandatsprozeß) Instanzen: RKG 1549 - 1565 (1444 - 1563) Beweismittel: Bd. I: Bestellung der kaiserlichen Kommissare (76). Bd. II enthält ausführliches Material über die Beziehungen der Stadt Soest zu den Herzögen von Kleve als Grafen von der Mark, u. a. Briefe der Herzöge an die Stadt Soest ab 1444 (53 - 58 und 65 - 86). Auszug aus dem Register der Stadt Soest ab 1481 (59 - 64). Auszüge aus Rechnungen der Stadt Soest, die klevisch - märkischen Landtage betreffend (86 - 100), Zeugenaussagen etc. Beschreibung: 2 Bde., 12 cm, 652 Bl.; Bd. I: 3 cm, 115 Bl., lose; zwei Protokolle, darin Q 1 - 18 außer 1* und 14*, dann jedoch 33 nicht quadrangulierte Aktenstücke; Bd. II: 9 cm, 537 Bl., gebunden; Protokoll der Verhandlungen vor dem kaiserlichen Kommissar (Lic. Stefan Vell).
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
