In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthaeltvermerke: Darin: Margareta und Johann von RAESFELD, Dompropst zu OSNABRÜCK, gegen Scheiffart von MERODE- BORNHEIM (Pfandschaft ERPRATH) (dabei: Urkunde Kaiser Friedrichs von 1475 September 22), 1477; Peter von REIDE gegen Godart SPEE (Pferderaub), 1492; Evert von REIFFERSCHEID gegen Johann von NEUENKIRCHEN, 1493; Jennet von REIFFERSCHEID, Frau zu ZOLVEREN, gegen Simon von BIRGEL und Werner von PALANT (Hof THUMB), 1424; Reinhard, Sohn des "folgenden Portzeners" Limbricht, gegen Scheiffart von MERODE- HEMMERSBERG (Forderung des Heinrich von HARFF), 1500; Wilhelm von RENNENBERG gegen Salentin von GYMNICH (Erbschaft), 1497; Heinrich von REUSCHENBERG gegen Gemeinde BREIEL (Zehnte), 1500; X gegen Heinrich von REUSCHENBERG (Schuld), [1480]; Johann von REUSCHENBERG zu SETTERICH gegen Arnd KOLLART (Schultheissenamt zu KESSENICH), 1493; Johann von REUSCHENBERG zu SETTERICH gegen Ludwig von der SLEIDEN (Erbe des HARPER von REUSCHENBERG), 1493; Gerhard von REVEN gegen Wilhelm von BURTSCHEID (Zweikampf), 1482; Wilhelm v.d. REVEN gegen Wwe. des Otto WALPOT von BASSENHEIM (Schuld), 1500; Frau von RHEYDT gegen Schöffen zu STOMMELN; Wilhelm, Herr zu RICHENSTEIN, gegen Wilhelm WINTER, 1451; Dietrich von RINSHEIM gegen Johann von AR zu ANTWEILER, 1490; Hermann zom RODEN LEWEN, Schultheiß zu JÜLICH, gegen Gemeinde BREIEL (Pacht), 1500; Johann von ROLLE aus GLADBACH gegen Johann von PALANT-WILDENBERG (Gewalt), 1478; Johann von ROLLE aus GLADBACH gegen Margarete von PALANT, Frau zu ODENKIRCHEN, 1492; Dietrich ROMERS gegen Vinzenz und Jacob v.d. HART (Gut im Gericht GLADBACH), 1505; Johann ROST zu DÜREN gegen Evert HESSE gen. BLIVER, 1493
Diverse Registraturbildner
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.