In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Erzbischof Dietrich und das Domkapitel zu Köln bekunden, dass ihnen Wilhelm, Herr zu Büren und Besigheim, 16.000 Gulden geliehen habe, wofür sie i...
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Erzbischof Dietrich und das Domkapitel zu Köln bekunden, dass ihnen Wilhelm, Herr zu Büren und Besigheim, 16.000 Gulden geliehen habe, wofür sie ihm Burg, Zollhaus und Pforte samt der Hälfte der Stadt Linz verpfänden. Graf Heinrich v. Nassau, Dompropst zu Mainz und Propst zu Bonn, dem sie die Stadt Linz bereits vorher verpfändet haben, hat seine Zustimmung dazu gegeben, dass Wilhelm v. Büren die Hälfte der Stadt zum Pfand erhält, hat sich jedoch den Mitgebrauch des Kelterhauses vorbehalten. Für das Darlehen sollen sie eine jährliche Gülte von 1.600 Gulden sowie weitere 100 Gulden für Lohn und Beköstigung der Wächter aus dem Zoll daselbst erhalten. Zu Bürgen werden gesetzt: Domdekan Graf Gottfried v. Sayn-Wittgenstein, Domküster Pfalzgraf Stephan, der Mainzer Dompropst Graf Heinrich v. Nassau, der stellvertretende Dekan Johann v. Reichenstein, Chorbischof Salentin v. Isenburg, Salentin v. Isenburg, Kepler der Kölner Kirchen, Graf Gumprecht v. Neuenahr, Erbvogt zu Köln und Herr zu Alpen, Johann v. Gemmerich, Luther Quade, Herr zu Tomburg und Landskron, Gerhard v. Eyneburg, Herr zu Landskron, Ritter Johann v. Heimburg und Siegfried v. Merode, Herr zu Clermont
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Aussteller, Bürgen, Stadt Linz
Vermerke (Urkunde): Weitere Überlieferung: B 2 Nr. 487 - in: Urk. von 1456 Febr. 29 (Nr.1360), s. dort
Vermerke (Urkunde): Literatur: Regest: Demandt, Reg. Katzenelnbogen 2, in Nr. 4916
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
