In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Staatsarchiv Amberg (Archivtektonik) >> Beständetektonik des Staatsarchivs Amberg >> IV. Nichtstaatliches Archivgut >> B. Archive des Adels, adelige Standesherrschaft und Jurisdiktion >> 4. Hofmarken und Patrimonialgerichte
1461-1531
Vorwort: Die Hofmark Woppenhof (Gde. Wernberg-Köblitz, Lkr. Schwandorf) hatte folgende Besitzer: Eberhard der Losaner (Losauer), 1356 bis Mitte des 15. Jahrhunderts Hostauer zu Woppenhof, Heinrich Fronberger (1455), Gilg Nothaft zum Bodenstein (1473), Georg Loterbeck (1487), Ulrich von Lichteneck, Hans von Brand, der 1526 den Woppenhof von den Leuchtenbergern kaufte. Auf die Familie von Brand folgten Johann Krapp (1626), Hans Albrecht von Kolbitz (1647), Georg Adam Baron von Junckner (1748/49), Baron von Lichtenstein (1775) und ab 1786 die Freiherren von Murach. Die Besitzungen lagen in Woppenhof und Deindorf. Der Bestand besteht aus 5 Archivalieneinheiten mit einer Laufzeit von 1461 bis 1531. Briefprotokolle: Briefprotokolle Vohenstrauß 1676-1705. Verwiesen sei auch auf den Bestand Hofmark Woppenhof.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
