In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Testament der Frau Henrich Gyse, geb. Elisabeth Venneman, früher Witwe Bernard Eiling (unterm Bogen, gegenüber Lambertikirchhof), vom 28. April 1656, verkündet am 19. Mai 1656.
Testament der Frau Henrich Gyse, geb. Elisabeth Venneman, früher Witwe Bernard Eiling (unterm Bogen, gegenüber Lambertikirchhof), vom 28. April 1656, verkündet am 19. Mai 1656.
Enthält: Ihr Sohn Bernard Eiling ist ohne Kinder gestorben; von ihm hat sie das Haus „das weiße Pferd“ auf der Hollenbeckerstraße geerbt, es aber den Eheleuten Jobst Achterman und Elsken Hövesche verkauft. Bedacht werden 1. Katharina Merschman oder deren Kinder, 2. Friedrich, Sohn des + Albert Giese, 3. Dieterich, Sohn des + Wilhelm Uding, 4. ihr Vetter Kleinschnitzler Gerd Witteler, 5. Eheleute Henrich Buschman und Maria Laurentz (Gadem vom Porthause auf der Kreuzstraße), 6. Henrich Wissing, 7. Berndt Hovesche, 8. Eheleute Lic. Henrich Bünichman und Anna Forckenbeck, 9. Berndt, Gertrud und Else, Kinder des Bernd Havers, 10. die Kinder des Christian Notbrake zu Amelsbüren, 11. Pastor Johan Wichartz und Küster Theodor Riesenbeck (an Lamberti), 12. Ennichen Nieport, 13. Elschen, Tochter der Eheleute Johan Lemgo und Gertrud Giese, 14. Eheleute Henrich Weischer, 15. Johan, Sohn der + Eheleute Henrich Uding u. Katharina Giese, 16. Johan Eilings im Armenhaus zu Ochtrup, 17. Abraham Dirxen als Testamentsvollstrecker. - Gerdt Weiling senior zu Ochtrup schuldet ihr 50 Th. Zeugen: Johan Gerdeman u. Johan Ahlers, Schumacher. Von Rats wegen: Peter Heggeler.
Archivale
Verweis: Vgl. B-Testa Nr. II, 476, 490
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
