In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Gräfin Anna v. Solms, verw. Gräfin v. Sayn, die Grafen Ruprecht v. Virneburg, Bernhard und Johann v. Solms sowie Diether v. Isenburg-Büdingen beku...
Urkunden der Grafschaft Solms-Rödelheim >> 3 1411-1440
1420 Mai 22, Lich
Abschrift
Urkunde
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: Mittwoch vor Pfingsttag
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Gräfin Anna v. Solms, verw. Gräfin v. Sayn, die Grafen Ruprecht v. Virneburg, Bernhard und Johann v. Solms sowie Diether v. Isenburg-Büdingen bekunden, dass sie auf ihrer wegen der Teilung der Grafschaft Falkenstein und der Herrschaft Münzenberg angesetzten Licher Zusammenkunft eine Einigung wegen des auf die Grafschaft verschriebenen Heiratsgeldes in Höhe von 6 000 Gulden durch Anna und Diether keine Einigung haben erzielen können. Sie haben deshalb einen Anlaß auf Gottfried v. Eppstein vereinbart, dem die Solmser bis 28. August (Mittwoch nach Bartholomeus) ihre Klagen, Diether und Anna innerhalb von drei Wochen danach ihre Antworten präsentieren sollen. Auf einem nach Butzbach anzusetzenden Tag sollen beide Parteien je einen Schiedsmann stellen. Die Solmser setzen zu Bürgen: Junggraf Philipp v. Virneburg, Ritter Gilbrecht Wais v. Fauerbach, Reinhard v. Schwalbach, Eberhard Schenk v. Schweinsberg d.J., Amtmann zu Laubach, Dietrich v. Staffel und Henne v. Bellersheim, Amtmann zu Lich
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Aussteller
Vermerke (Urkunde): Weitere Überlieferung: C 1 Nr. 39 Bl. 34-35
Vermerke (Urkunde): Literatur: Regest: Battenberg, Isenburger Urkunden Nr. 1212
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
