In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Gutachten und Urteile über verschiedene Streitigkeiten zwischen dem Fürstbistum Paderborn und der Grafschaft Lippe sowie zwischen dem Fürstbistum Paderborn und dessen Vasallen
Gutachten und Urteile über verschiedene Streitigkeiten zwischen dem Fürstbistum Paderborn und der Grafschaft Lippe sowie zwischen dem Fürstbistum Paderborn und dessen Vasallen
Manuskripte VII >> 3. Regierungsbezirk Minden / Detmold >> 3.4. Fürstbistum Paderborn >> 3.4.8. Mittelbare und unmittelbare Herrschaften, die mit dem Bistum Paderborn in Beziehung standen (Rheda, Büren, Pyrmont, Rietberg)
1672-1733
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält v.a. Gedrucktes Reprotestationsschreiben Paderborns an das Reichskammergericht über die Jurisdiktion in den Ämtern Schwalenberg und Oldenburg, mit Anlagen, 1672; Wahlkapitulation des Paderborner Bischofs Clemens August, 1719; Gutachten über Streitigkeiten zwischen von Spiegel und dem Fürstbistum Paderborn über Streitigkeiten über die luth. Religionsausübung auf dem Spiegelschen Haus Schweckhausen, um 1733; Rechtsgutachten der Universität Ingolstadt in Sachen Stift Busdorf gegen die Brüder von Brencken, 1726
Sammlungsregistraturbildner
Sachakte
Paderborner Bischofs Clemens August
von Spiegel
von Brencken
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.