In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Prozess zwischen der Löffelholz'schen Eigenherrschaft Gibitzenhof und dem Rat der Stadt wegen der Ausübung des Metzgerhandwerks durch Friedrich Gundel aus Lauf in Gibitzenhof
Prozess zwischen der Löffelholz'schen Eigenherrschaft Gibitzenhof und dem Rat der Stadt wegen der Ausübung des Metzgerhandwerks durch Friedrich Gundel aus Lauf in Gibitzenhof
Enthält:
1) Mandat Kaiser Karls VI. [d.h. des Reichshofrats] betr. die Klage des Johann Hieronimus Loeffelholz und Johann Sigmund Loeffelholz wegen Gewerbsbeeinträchtigung des in Gibitzenhof eingekauften Landmetzgers Friedrich Gundel durch die Stadtmetzger und das Rugamt, d.d. 9. Nov. 1730.
2) Auszug aus einem Schreiben des Reichshofratsagenten de Grave [?] betr. das angebliche Niederlassungsverbot für Landmetzger innerhalb einer Meile um Nürnberg, d.d. 24. Jan. 1731.
3) Aufforderung des Reichshofrates an den Rat, innerhalb von 2 Monaten den Vollzug des kaiserl. Mandats zu melden, d.d. 22. Feb. 1732.
4) Auszüge aus Schreiben des Reichshofratsagenten de Gave [?] betr. seine Tätigkeit in der Streitsache, d.d. 13. Sept. u. 16. Okt. 1732.
5) Verhörprotokoll betr. das Metzgerhandwerk in Gibitzenhof, o.D. [Fragment].
Umfang/Beschreibung: 5 St.
Archivale
Indexbegriff Person: Grave, N de (?)
Indexbegriff Person: Gundel, Friedrich
Indexbegriff Person: Karl VI. (Kaiser)
Indexbegriff Person: Loeffelholz, Johann Hieronimus
Metzger
Metzgerhandwerk
Reichshofrat
Reichshofratsprozess
Eigenherrschaft, Löffelholzsche
Prozess
Mandat
Landmetzger
Rugamt
Gewerbsbeeinträchtigung
Reichshofratsagent
Rat der Stadt
Verhörprotokoll
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
