In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Urkunde Nr. 95 - Gerichtliche Klärung von Eigentumsverhältnissen an Grundbesitz
(1) 30. Apr. 1441 (vp sunte Philips Ind Jacobi auent De heylige apostels); 19 Okt. 1486 (des neesten Doirdages nae sunte lucien dach ind Is die negentynde Dach dit maent octobris)
Vor den Weseler Schöffen (Grepenen) Evert Tybis und Johan Bogell legt Bernt Bolant eine Urkunde vor, in der die Schöffen zu Wesel Deryck Offermann und Henrick vp den Brinck folgenden Inhalt festgehalten haben: (1) Deryck Offermann, Johans Sohn, überträgt alle seine Rechte an dem Gut Radekait / Radenkate und einer Wiese namens Rumppynck goirken im Stift Münster, Kirchspiel Rhede auf dem der huysman die Helle vpp woenet an seinen Schwager Bernt Bolant und dessen Ehefrau Styne. Darüber hinaus präsentiert Bernt Bolant zwei weitere Heiratsurkunden: (2) Alyt Offermann gibt dem Teuwert Dyrken im Beisein ihrer Söhne Henrick und Derick ihre Tochter Mechtelt zur Ehefrau. (3) Die aus der Ehe entstandene Tochter Stynken wird dem Bernt Bolant zur Ehefrau gegeben. Hieraus wurden die folgenden Kinder geboren: Johan, Herr Bernt, Teuwes und Katharina. Die Aussteller bestätigen die Rechtsinhalte der drei Urkunden und kündigen ihre Siegel an. Der Notar Gerhardus de Meer, Kleriker der Diözese Köln, beglaubigt die Urkunde.
Original Pergament Niederdeutsch, 2 Siegel anhängend, gut erhalten.
Archivale
Bürgen/Zeugen: Zeugen: (1) Bernt Wynck, Arnt up den Brynck, Derick Fietgen, Arnt Pasman, Johan Hase - als rechte Erbgenossen des Derick Offermann
Rückvermerke: Erffkauff breff vff dem Rodekotten, vff eine wieschen genannt dat Rumpinck Gorken (17. Jh.)
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
