Urteilsbegründungen der Assessoren am Tribunal
Show full title
0141
LAG, Rep. 29 Wismarer Tribunal
Wismarer Tribunal >> 02. Relationen
01.01.1781-31.03.1781
Der Vormund des Philipp David von Krauthoff contra den Gemeinen Anwalt des Bergelaschen Concurs. - Der Schäfer Meyer zu Poel contra den Amtmann Jörn. - Der Cantori Schultz in Barth contra seine Ehefrau. - Der Advocati Fabricius contra die von Krantzow. - Die Kinder und Enkel des verstorbenen General Stenzler contra dem Ministerium zu Greifswald. - Der Lieutnant von Krassow zu Marlow contra den Landrat von Lancken. - Maria Dorothea Aschern contra den Pensionarium Helwig zu Vierow. - Ida von Normann contra den von Normann zu Tribberaz. - Der Licentverwalter Ludwig Alberti contra seine Ehefrau. - Rektor und Concil der Academie zu Greifswald contra den Archidiacon von Aeminga. - Der Mühlenbursche David Dähn contra Margaretha Elisabeth Fischer. - Doctor Gesterding zu Greifswald contra den Apotheker Hassertz. - Der Altermann Carl Zacharias Hagemeister contra die Freesefeldschen Creditoren. - Der Kammerrat von Boltenstern contra Martin Hinrich von Kessenbrink. - Der Oberkrüger Rodust zu Neukloster contra das königliche Amtsgericht. - Der Krüger Köhn zu Neukloster contra den Beauftragten der Krone. - Der Seidenhändler Hinrich Friedrich Dahlmann contra Elisabeth Dorothea Karthaus. - Der Schiffer Kröpelin contra den Steuermann Brandt. - Major und Ritter von Wulffcrona contra den Gemeinen Anwald des Usedomschen Concurs. - Der Mühlenbursche David Dähn zu Stralsund contra den Bäcker Fischer zu Bergen. - Der Kapitän von Ketel contra die königlich Pommersche Kammer
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
29.10.2025, 11:27 AM CET