In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Testament der Eheleute Linnenweber M. Herman zum Hülse und Else Regenhorst, früher Witwe Jost thor Mollen, vom 13. September 1630, verkündet am 16. April 1635 nach dem Tode des Mannes.
Testament der Eheleute Linnenweber M. Herman zum Hülse und Else Regenhorst, früher Witwe Jost thor Mollen, vom 13. September 1630, verkündet am 16. April 1635 nach dem Tode des Mannes.
Darin: 18.4.1634: Kodizill des Mannes. Johan Schumacher in Coesfeld schuldet ihm 300 Th.. Vermächtnis erhält ferner seinen Vetter Bernard zum Hülse, sacellanus zu St. Mauritz. Zeugen: Johan Vorspoel, Bäcker, und Jobst Degener.
Enthält: Gegenseitige Erbeinsetzung; Ehe kinderlos. Auch der Mann war schon mal verheiratet. Vermächtnisse erhalten seitens des Mannes: 1. Maria, Herman und Johan Struving, Kinder seiner + Schwester, 2. Gertrud zum Hülse, Witwe M. Lambert zur Stegge, die Vortochter seines + Bruders M. Henrich zum Hülse, und deren Sohn, 3. Johan, Sohn des Albert Wimeling, 4. Agathe Husing im Dorf Havixbeck, Schwester seiner + Frau, 5. Else Bischoping in der Hoffringes-Stegge, 6. die Kinder seines + Bruders Henrich zum Hülse; seitens der Frau a. Johan, Margarete und Henrich, Kinder ihres + Mannes Jobst zur Möllen, b. Margarete, Tochter ihres + Halbbruders Henrich Rengenhorst, c. die Kinder ihrer Brüder Johan und Niklas Rengenhorst, d. ihr Bruder Henrich Regenhorst, der in die Fremde gegangen ist, e. die etwaigen Kinder ihres + Bruders Berndt, welcher früher in Utrecht wohnte. Zeugen: Weinhändler Borchard Lendeken und Notar Henrich Uphaus. Von Rats wegen: Wilhelm von Höseden.
Archivale
Verweis: Vgl. B-Testa Nr. II, 696 und B-Testa Nr. II, 61
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
