Ludwig, Bischof von Bamberg, urteilt in der Differenz zwischen Otto, Abt des Klosters Michelsberg zu Bamberg, und Chunz Hornung zu Baunach nach einer Klage am Landgericht Nürnberg um einen Hof zu Oberleiterbach ("Obernleiterbach") zugunsten Ottos. Mitsiegler und Taidinger: Lutz vom Rotenhan, Geck von Niederfüllbach ("Fulbach"), Friedrich ("Fridreich") Stiebar, Ritter, Chunz vom Rotenhan und Fritz Haut. - S 1 = A, S 2 = Lutz von Rotenhan, S 3 = Geck von Füllbach, S 4 = Friedrich Stiebar, S 5 = Chunz von Rotenhan, S 6 = Fritz Haut

Show full title
Staatsarchiv Bamberg
Ludwig, Bischof von Bamberg, urteilt in der Differenz zwischen Otto, Abt des Klosters Michelsberg zu Bamberg, und Chunz Hornung zu Baunach nach einer Klage am Landgericht Nürnberg um einen Hof zu Oberleiterbach ("Obernleiterbach") zugunsten Ottos. Mitsiegler und Taidinger: Lutz vom Rotenhan, Geck von Niederfüllbach ("Fulbach"), Friedrich ("Fridreich") Stiebar, Ritter, Chunz vom Rotenhan und Fritz Haut. - S 1 = A, S 2 = Lutz von Rotenhan, S 3 = Geck von Füllbach, S 4 = Friedrich Stiebar, S 5 = Chunz von Rotenhan, S 6 = Fritz Haut
Kloster Michelsberg, Urkunden 461
Kloster Michelsberg, Urkunden
Kloster Michelsberg, Urkunden >> Aktenplan Archiv >> Archivbestände >> Urkunden
1370 V 12
17 x 25,5
Ausfertigung, dt., Pergament, 6 Siegel anhängend (S1 bis S 3 fehlen, S 3 Rest und abgetrennt, S 4 und S 5 beschädigt, S 6 Rest)
Urkunden
deutsch
Bamberg, Bischof Ludwig von Meißen
Rotenhan, Lutz von
Fulbach, Geck von
Stiebar, Fridreich
Rotenhan, Chuntz von
Hant, Fritz
Hornung, Chuntz, Baunach (Lk Ebern)
Baunach (Lk Ebern), Hornung Chuntz
Nürnberg, Landgericht
Bamberg, Kloster Michelsberg, Abt Otto von Fuchs
Bamberg, Kloster Michelsberg
Oberleiterbach (Lk Staffelstein)

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
15.04.2025, 3:34 PM CEST
Staatsarchiv Bamberg

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Staatsarchiv Bamberg