In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage des Kaufherrn Johan von Lengel in Rheine ./. den Maler Niklas von Ringe wegen einer Forderung von 50 Thalern (laut Anlage 1).
Darin: Anlage 1 (Abschrift): 12.6.1604. Vertrag zwischen 1. Meister Ludger von Ringe in Lübbecke, verheiratet mit Sophia Vingke, 2. Niklas von Ringe, verheiratet mit Anna Moll, 3. Herman von Ringe, den Söhnen der + Eheleute Herman von Ringe und Alheit zu der Horst. Ludger hat durch das Testament der Eltern deren Haus am Honekamp erhalten; er überlässt es seinem Bruder Niklas. Dieser übernimmt dafür Schulden an die Testamentsvollstrecker des Henrich von Detten, an Johan von Lengell, an Henrich Vorckenbeck und an Johan Bresser. Zeugen: Dr. med. Georg Moll; Johan Loesman; Notar Herman Floge; Rudolf Pott. Anlage 2: Brief des Beklagten an den Kläger vom 16.9.1609.
Enthält: Erwähnt werden: Anna Poppelman, Schwester des Beklagten; Goldschmied Evert van Hattingen in Rheine, Schwager des Beklagten; Johan Smeddinck, Diener des Beklagten; Wilhelm Wirtz; Henrich Poll; David Poelman, Stadtsekretär in Lübbecke.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
CC0 1.0 Universal