In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Korrespondenz zwischen Sayn und Nassau-Dillenburg über gemeinsames Vorgehen in Kriminalfällen
Freier Grund Sel- und Burbach >> 2. Sayn-Hachenburgische Regierung >> 2.10. Verbrechen und Strafen, Brandsachen, Falschgeld
1544, 1608-1621, 1680
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Schreiben des Grafen zu Sayn an den Grafen zu Nassau-Dillenburg wegen eines Gefangenen (Samstag nach Pfingsten 1544); Schreiben der saynischen Räte zu Hachenburg an den Schulheißen Martinus Scheel zu Burbach wegen eines begangenen Kindesmords der Tochter des Johann Bunzel zu Seelbach (22.02.1608); Schreiben des Grafen Georg zu Nassau-Dillenburg an Graf Wilhelm III. zu Sayn wegen des gemeinsamen Vorgehens gegen Curdt Wilhelm von Selbach aufgrund eines nicht gezahlten Bußgeldes (14.01.1617); Abschrift eines Schreibens des Grafen Wilhelm III. zu Sayn an Graf Georg zu Nassau-Dillenburg wegen Überlassung der in Dillenburg auf Garnison liegenden Soldaten, welche im Grund Burbach Fuhrleute angegriffen hatten (28.06.1621); Schreiben des Grafen Ludwig Heinrich zu Nassau-Dillenburg an Graf Wilhelm III. zu Sayn wegen Übergabe von vier zu Burbach verhafteten Soldaten, welche im Grund Burbach Fuhrleute angegriffen hatten (27.06.1621); Schreiben des Grafen Georg zu Nassau-Dillenburg an Graf Wilhelm III. zu Sayn wegen Übergabe von vier zu Burbach verhafteten Soldaten, welche im Grund Burbach Fuhrleute angegriffen hatten (29.06.1621); Bericht des Oberschultheißen Arnold Jäger zu Neunkirchen an die Gräfin Louisa Juliana zu Sayn über einen Diebstahl im Haus des Gilsbacher Heimbergers (12.08.1680). Korrespondenten u.a.: Georg Graf zu Nassau-Dillenburg, Ludwig Heinrich Graf zu Nassau-Dillenburg, Arnold Jäger (Neunkirchen).
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.