In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Amand [von Buseck], Abt von Fulda, bestätigt den Vergleich zwischen der Propstei Neuenberg und der Stadt Frankfurt
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: 1742 Dec 29; 1743 den 1ten Febr.; 1743 den 2ten Febr.
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Amand [von Buseck], Abt von Fulda, bestätigt den Vergleich zwischen der Propstei Neuenberg [Gem. Fulda, Lkr. Fulda] und der Stadt Frankfurt betreffend die Erbbestände, Lehen- und Zinsleute der Propstei Neuenberg in Bonames [Stadtteil der Stadt Frankfurt am Main]. Dechant und Konvent von Fulda bestätigen den Vergleich. Leopold Specht von Bubenheim, Propst zu Neuenberg, bestätigt den Vergleich.
Die Urkunden lagen ursprünglich der Nr. 1351 bei.
Die Zustimmung des Dechants und Konvents von Fulda und des Propsts von Neuenberg folgen im Anschluss an den Konsens Abt Amands.
Vgl. Urk. 77 Nr. 1352.
Vgl. zum Kloster Neuenberg/Andreasberg (Fulda) Germania Benedictina Bd. VII, S. 465-479.
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.